Bye bye Starmer
Re: Bye bye Starmer
To be fair it’s not Labour saying the previous government policies were wrong, it’s everyone. Rwanda was binned on day 1. He’s definitely on it straight away.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
The migrant control people based at Ramsgate are hiring 
My colleague has been told to book further in advance as they can’t keep a room for him anymore.
It begins !
Dave!
My colleague has been told to book further in advance as they can’t keep a room for him anymore.
It begins !
Dave!
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Yeah, but but, erm... he doesn't work Friday evenings which is unforgivableGavster wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2024 11:45 amFirst cabinet meeting held on a Saturday since Covid… he’s sending signals that they’re on it. The challenge will be getting results quickly too.dinny_g wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2024 8:44 amI agree Jobbo - he’s not going to change the world overnight but he has to start changing things and right away. For the past number of years, there’s been a constant stream of saying Tory Policy is wrong and to blame and Labour policy will get results.Jobbo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 11:31 pm I really don’t think Starmer is a caretaker. A safe pair of hands would be a better description. He’s filled his first cabinet with sensible and knowledgeable ministers so there is strength in depth.
Well now’s your time - in effect, prove it.
I’ll be mighty disappointed if we vote for change but get largely the same

Oui, je suis un motard.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Funny how actually dealing with migrants rather than talking about sending them to Rwanda seems to be an obvious plan. Will see how effective it is.
Quiet competence may be what the country wants. It’s certainly what it needs. I look forward to not having another constitution-challenging policy from the government every week.
Quiet competence may be what the country wants. It’s certainly what it needs. I look forward to not having another constitution-challenging policy from the government every week.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
It’s more about the influx they are expecting, they just fed, clothed and put them on a bus before. If they have an extra bus it’ll be even harder to get a parking space after work nowJobbo wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2024 4:58 pm Funny how actually dealing with migrants rather than talking about sending them to Rwanda seems to be an obvious plan. Will see how effective it is.
Quiet competence may be what the country wants. It’s certainly what it needs. I look forward to not having another constitution-challenging policy from the government every week.
Sunaks comment about working Fridays was a bit silly, whether Starmer was going to work this Saturday or not I don’t think anyone cared about but of course he was going to now. Some politicians really do set themselves up for ridicule don’t they.
Dave!
Re: Bye bye Starmer
It's indicative of how little the Conservatives had to say of any substance, and how woefully lazy and incompetent they've become after knocking on a decade and a half in power and letting loudmouthed populists run the show - they have barely any actual politicians left - just people spouting soundbites fed to them.
Fucking glad to see the back of that shite.
Fucking glad to see the back of that shite.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Rwanda wasn't 'binned on day 1' though - he simply said 'we're not going to be sending any immigrants there'. In this instance 'binning' is just a press release or a comment to a reporter. The act hasn't been repealed, and as far as I've heard it won't be.Jobbo wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2024 4:11 pm To be fair it’s not Labour saying the previous government policies were wrong, it’s everyone. Rwanda was binned on day 1. He’s definitely on it straight away.
I'll be interested to hear what his answer is though. Processing the backlog is all well and good, but it's actual removals that he will fail on as we don't have return agreements with most of the countries many claim to be from. Ergo it'll be 'no you can't have asylum, but we can't do anything about it'.
I'm not making light of the situation either - overseas processing centres for asylum applications in France or whatever won't fix anything - those who are approved will come across and those who are denied are more motivated than ever to jump on a dinghy and risk it. 'Smashing the gangs' sounds like a start but requires a lot of international cooperation, and I've always been suspicious of how motivated foreign powers are to stopping the asylum seekers leaving their shores for ours. There's no incentive for them to do so.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Thought the answer was to build an extra 40,000 homes a year over what the Conservatives had pledged - which tallies in with the number of immigrants arriving.
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Maybe I'm oversimplifying it but they all seem to come over and nice new rubber ducks with shiny outboards. Surely stem the supply and it will make crossing harder .
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Edit: Google suggests they have tried that and the smugglers are importing them from Trumps favourite country. Again though they can't be in small boxes when they come through in the post..Shlergen wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2024 8:57 pm Maybe I'm oversimplifying it but they all seem to come over and nice new rubber ducks with shiny outboards. Surely stem the supply and it will make crossing harder .
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I thought they just steal small boats from the many various harbours in the region. Regardless, if you have a whole gang network it isn’t beyond anyone’s ability to go a bit further afield to buy/steal one.
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Bye bye Starmer
From the videos seen - maybe propaganda, they all look new. A quick Google:Mito Man wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:21 pm I thought they just steal small boats from the many various harbours in the region. Regardless, if you have a whole gang network it isn’t beyond anyone’s ability to go a bit further afield to buy/steal one.
Where do the boats come from?
In the past, people would go to Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium and would buy boats there. But that has decreased because it was discovered [by police].
So now people bring the boats from Turkey - they can buy them in bulk and it's cheaper.
It costs around €3,500. So they buy five or six and send them to Germany by post, and then from Germany, cars transport them to France.
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 5526
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I only recently became aware that the Danish have been sending migrants to Rwanda for a few years. Not controversial either apparently.
I've always thought it a fairly abhorrent policy tbh, but to see one of those socialist Scandi countries has been doing such a thing for a while made me pause for thought.
I've always thought it a fairly abhorrent policy tbh, but to see one of those socialist Scandi countries has been doing such a thing for a while made me pause for thought.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
^^ I did not know that either.
Reflecting further on this, the whole situation is exacerbated by the borderless Schengen region. Once migrants are 'in' they can cross to the north France coastline relatively unhindered. The only way you will properly 'stop the boats' is by those migrants being removed from France by their authorities. The end.
Reflecting further on this, the whole situation is exacerbated by the borderless Schengen region. Once migrants are 'in' they can cross to the north France coastline relatively unhindered. The only way you will properly 'stop the boats' is by those migrants being removed from France by their authorities. The end.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: Bye bye Starmer
And I see that wanker is proposing ID cards again, this time to tackle illegal immigration.
Quite how he thinks that you or me having a digital ID card will deter an ILLEGAL immigrant is beyond me. But then again, thinking was never one of Blairs strong suits.
Quite how he thinks that you or me having a digital ID card will deter an ILLEGAL immigrant is beyond me. But then again, thinking was never one of Blairs strong suits.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 5932
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Swervin_Mervin wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:56 pm I only recently became aware that the Danish have been sending migrants to Rwanda for a few years. Not controversial either apparently.
I've always thought it a fairly abhorrent policy tbh, but to see one of those socialist Scandi countries has been doing such a thing for a while made me pause for thought.
Much like here it hasn't actually happened as far as I can see. Lots of talk, policy declarations and whatnot, but from what I've read it never took off.
That's not to say it isn't an abhorrent policy, and I wouldn't be surprised if at the root of it is the lurch to the right created by consecutive governments on the centre-left/centre/centre-right letting the Danish People's Party set the agenda and narrative for nearly 20 years.
Edit: although the policy proposal predates the UK one (I think) it seems like they weren't as advanced as the UK and were waiting to see if it worked.
I'm ashamed of my country.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Bye bye Starmer
If only we had another government issued document that certified a persons nationality and identity.Simon wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2024 10:18 pm And I see that wanker is proposing ID cards again, this time to tackle illegal immigration.
Quite how he thinks that you or me having a digital ID card will deter an ILLEGAL immigrant is beyond me. But then again, thinking was never one of Blairs strong suits.
How about not having a sig at all?
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 5526
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Ahh - thanks for the clarity Alex. The article I'd read made out like it had happened and was now a non-issue amongst the public i.e. had been forgotten about and they were on with other issues being the focus of their political concern.
Sounds like that article was hugely disingenuous though.
Sounds like that article was hugely disingenuous though.
- integrale_evo
- Posts: 5443
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I don’t think anyone actually wanted to send people there, but to be a deterrent and send a signal that you might not end up staying in the uk for free. Ok, so you might have to send a plane with a few on to prove you can do it, which isn’t great. The threat of it was already having an impact from various interviews with various groups both in Ireland and France when the bill was passed.
Cheers, Harry
- Rich B
- Posts: 11513
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
- Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I still call bullshit on the "evidence" it was working. Made up reports from made up immigrants.
The reality is, we've spent £370 million on the scheme so far and not a single person has been sent against their will. Thats the equivalent of the amount of tax paid in their whole lifetime for c. 300 average people in this country.
Why they would claim anyone was afraid of such utter incompetence is beyond belief.
The reality is, we've spent £370 million on the scheme so far and not a single person has been sent against their will. Thats the equivalent of the amount of tax paid in their whole lifetime for c. 300 average people in this country.
Why they would claim anyone was afraid of such utter incompetence is beyond belief.