OV9

Jobbo wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 11:23 am I can see Brand’s defence for court a mile off: “I was shagger of the year 3 times, everyone knew I was promiscuous and I made no secret of publicly inviting people back for sex at the end of my shows or generally. So anyone who did come round was knowingly consenting.”

Shame for him and his supporters about the text messages of a lass saying "when a girl says no she means no" and "when I say condom, it isn't optional" which in context, sounds pretty non-consensual.

The comedy circuit has been opening up with lots of people saying they kept their female friends/staff/family the fuck away from him because they knew he was a danger to them - and people have tried to say that before publicly, but have had legal threats against them from him, he's had injunctions put up, etc - so the sooner the little shit is up on criminal charges and this is put to bed, the better I reckon.



(it has since confirmed that yes, it was Brand she was talking about)

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fw ... -bzr58dqqp

Not that that will convince the swivel eyed loons who all think that it's a conspiracy by big pharma etc.

1000 women a year and he doesn't want to use a condom?

We've all been there Duncs, a latex allergy is no joke!

Maybe he got so many STDs that it messed with his brain? There’s something about men who fuck 1000’s of women - they’re all a bit unhinged.

You mean neurosyphilis. Probably more likely the aftereffect of being a heroin junkie.

From his own admission he was a drug addled promiscuous lecher so I'm amazed its taken this long for someone to feel aggrieved at his behaviour.

Not watched the programme but would presenting the accusations in this manner not compromise a criminal case against him?

I'm not an Incel but it seems odd to make a TV programme about a potential sexual assault before its investigated and I say that with the utmost respect to those who may have been abused or feel aggrieved by his actions.

Beany wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 7:57 pm RusselBrandRape.jpg

EMF: You're unexpectable!

Everything about that "screenshot" looks fake.

I can't stand the bloke, but trial by social media isn't helpful to anyone.

I mean, he's welcome to sue Dispatches and the Times for libel if it's not real.

Funny how, as far as I'm aware, he hasn't yet - given his successful history of litigation in the past - and instead just riled up his swivel eyed supporter base instead.

Edit: The broader point is that if The Times and Dispatches are making shit up/haven't checked their facts/are being taken for a ride - which isn't impossible - then the sort of retaliatory legal action could feasibly end Dispatches entirely as a program and risk Channel 4s position as a relatively independant channel, and would probably ruin the Times reputation for a generation.

They are big stakes and it's unlikely they're gonna just accept 'a screenshot of some texts' as evidence; it's not unreasonable to assume - given the position they are in - that they've done enough due diligence to ensure they're not wide open legally.

duncs500 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm 1000 women a year

2.8 women a day, EVERY DAY!

Who's got the energy for that?!

unzippy wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:27 pm

duncs500 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm 1000 women a year

2.8 women a day, EVERY DAY!

Who's got the energy for that?!

Cocaine. Cocaine has the energy. Lots and lots of cocaine

jamcg wrote: Thu Oct 05, 2023 7:34 am

unzippy wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:27 pm

duncs500 wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:17 pm 1000 women a year

2.8 women a day, EVERY DAY!

Who's got the energy for that?!

Cocaine. Cocaine has the energy. Lots and lots of cocaine

I thought cocaine kind of had a detrimental effect in that department?

DaveE wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2023 10:50 am

jamcg wrote: Thu Oct 05, 2023 7:34 am

unzippy wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:27 pm

2.8 women a day, EVERY DAY!

Who's got the energy for that?!

Cocaine. Cocaine has the energy. Lots and lots of cocaine

I thought cocaine kind of had a detrimental effect in that department?

Cocaine and viagra then?

Aside from his desperate antics embracing Christian right wing America over the last year, he also recently re-tweeted a document which claimed BBC star Penelope Keith assassinated JFK while also being sued for £220k for not wrting two books which he was contracted to complete.

He's not actually been arrested for sex crimes though, which is where this thread started. Too slippery/lacking in evidence from victims/some other reason?

Not sure on that front. Also curious that Andrew Tate has been allowed to travel without facing trial.

What woman would want to put themselves through a trial when the whole right wing ecosphere would be after them?

Gavster wrote: Mon Mar 24, 2025 9:30 am he also recently re-tweeted a document which claimed BBC star Penelope Keith assassinated JFK

WTF?

Gavster wrote: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:17 am Not sure on that front. Also curious that Andrew Tate has been allowed to travel without facing trial.

Florida authorities were looking into him - even Trump can't make an exception for someone actively charged with active noncery and sexual abuse in what's effectively his home state so I suspect they made him fuck off back to Romania before that properly kicked off.