It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

User avatar
mik
Posts: 14690
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

Cyclist should have overtaken safely at 40-45mph
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12178
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

Broccers wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 4:13 pm
Jobbo wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2023 2:25 pm I think you're confused. The law is clear and you're just trolling. Bye then.
I'm not confused - you are a boring cunt. Toodle pip.
Such a disappointment to see you post again after that. What do you think Toodle Pip means? Still confused?
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

I cannot understand why anyone would undertake a vehicle that is indicating left.
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6625
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by dinny_g »

I’m going to say cyclists as they’ve tried to undertake a car that’s clearly indicated they’re turning left.

But with the new rules, who knows. Probably the car 🤷🏻
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
8Ball
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:39 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by 8Ball »

Technically the driver, as he's turned across the cycle lane where the cyclist would have had priority.

However, cycle lane had only just started so flying down it straight away was a bit silly when the car had just indicated to turn left. Cyclist by his own admission says he thought the driver was lost, which should have given him reason to pause, and he was closer than was really sensible in my view.
tim
Posts: 1868
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

Gavster wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 7:01 am
I cannot understand why anyone would undertake a vehicle that is indicating left.
Quite.

If you scroll down the comments a bit, the guy says he thought he was turning left further on. So, idiot cyclist makes a wrong assumption and naturally it's the car drivers fault for failing to apply a neural connection/rub his crystal balls.

Also he was riding far too close to the back of the car from way back.

He's not looking for a constructive appraisal of the situation tho, he just wants the cycling mentalists to agree with him.
You settle up, I'll go get the Jag.
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

I fkin bet the cyclist wouldn't have tried that same manoeuvre if the vehicle was an HGV.
8Ball
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:39 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by 8Ball »

Probably! His awareness wasn't great.

Equally though, would the driver have turned if that was a bus going down a bus lane?
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

8Ball wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:07 am
Equally though, would the driver have turned if that was a bus going down a bus lane?
True. In that respect, they both moved into the path of a moving vehicle.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12178
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

The Skoda was indicating well before the cycle lane started anyway. I don't attribute any blame to the driver at all, personally. I see Cycling Mikey says it's entirely the car's fault. If it had been two cars which collided at the start of a two-lane stretch of road where the car in front was indicating left before the two-lane section and the car behind went to undrtake, it's quite obvious who would be found at fault.
tim
Posts: 1868
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

The fact the tool has turned off replies unless he follows you has backfired somewhat. 320 quote-tweet so far, and they're all pretty golden. :D
You settle up, I'll go get the Jag.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12178
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

Is the person who posted it the cyclist who came off? Oh dear.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12178
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

Useful snippets from the Highway Code here:
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14690
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

This won't abate until we get a group of similarly hardline pedestrians, who camera-up and intentionally jump off the pavement in front of moving cyclists based on the fact that they are the most vulnerable road users and therefore have right of way.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12158
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Mito Man »

mik wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:34 am This won't abate until we get a group of similarly hardline pedestrians, who camera-up and intentionally jump off the pavement in front of moving cyclists based on the fact that they are the most vulnerable road users and therefore have right of way.
I demand we use toddlers instead and strap go pros on them. Really emphasise the vulnerability point.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 994
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by MikeHunt »

8Ball wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:07 am Equally though, would the driver have turned if that was a bus going down a bus lane?
To be fair a 10 ton red bus is a little bit easier to spot than a cyclist who may have been in the blindspot.
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

I'd love to film myself riding around town so I could post all of the examples where I calmly take preventative action to avoid getting run over, or avoid flattening pedestrians, however nobody would watch it.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14690
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

Gavster wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:49 am I'd love to film myself riding around town so I could post all of the examples where I calmly take preventative action to avoid getting run over, or avoid flattening pedestrians, however nobody would watch it.
Oh please do - and tag Jeremy Vile and Cycling Mikey in it.
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

mik wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:51 am
Gavster wrote: Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:49 am I'd love to film myself riding around town so I could post all of the examples where I calmly take preventative action to avoid getting run over, or avoid flattening pedestrians, however nobody would watch it.
Oh please do - and tag Jeremy Vile and Cycling Mikey in it.
It would basically be the Ogmios school of cycling :D I don't like arriving places sweaty so ride around 7mph too :lol:

Post Reply