Page 211 of 438
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:17 pm
by Broccers
Daily updates from Katie Hopkins on Instagram are where my intel comes from


.
Far too many what ifs, you guys are supposedly clever. Don't be taken for fools.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:23 pm
by Jobbo
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:25 pm
Yes you tell me the answer but question one thing. Worldwide deaths are less than 1 percent. How can that be such a major disaster?
It’s not a major disaster due to the massive efforts to keep deaths down. We are on about 1/10th of the expected deaths if there hadn’t been lockdown. Would 10% of the population of the world being wiped out by one new virus seem a major disaster?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:26 pm
by Broccers
Jobbo wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:23 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:25 pm
Yes you tell me the answer but question one thing. Worldwide deaths are less than 1 percent. How can that be such a major disaster?
It’s not a major disaster due to the massive efforts to keep deaths down. We are on about 1/10th of the expected deaths if there hadn’t been lockdown. Would 10% of the population of the world being wiped out by one new virus seem a major disaster?
Sorry I'm firmly in the not buying it camp. You're all welcome to your opinions but when your own incompetent government finally recognised it's older or ill people that need to take measures it's an admission of over reaction.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:02 pm
by drcarlos
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:52 pm
drcarlos wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:48 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:25 pm
Yes you tell me the answer but question one thing. Worldwide deaths are less than 1 percent. How can that be such a major disaster?
What’s the source for that, only asking as I heard 2.3% from somewhere but couldn’t find a source for that either.
Are you taking deaths or infection?
Deaths
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:30 pm
by Broccers
drcarlos wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:02 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:52 pm
drcarlos wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:48 pm
What’s the source for that, only asking as I heard 2.3% from somewhere but couldn’t find a source for that either.
Are you taking deaths or infection?
Deaths
Associate or actual?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:11 pm
by drcarlos
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:30 pm
drcarlos wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:02 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:52 pm
Are you taking deaths or infection?
Deaths
Associate or actual?
Not sure to be honest, do we have current figures for both?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:18 pm
by Jobbo
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:26 pm
Jobbo wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:23 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:25 pm
Yes you tell me the answer but question one thing. Worldwide deaths are less than 1 percent. How can that be such a major disaster?
It’s not a major disaster due to the massive efforts to keep deaths down. We are on about 1/10th of the expected deaths if there hadn’t been lockdown. Would 10% of the population of the world being wiped out by one new virus seem a major disaster?
Sorry I'm firmly in the not buying it camp. You're all welcome to your opinions but when your own incompetent government finally recognised it's older or ill people that need to take measures it's an admission of over reaction.
You think 4 months of the biggest change to our way of life since WW2 has done nothing?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:20 pm
by Beany
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:17 pm
Daily updates from Katie Hopkins on Instagram are where my intel comes from


.
I don't think this was a joke.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:39 pm
by Broccers
Jobbo wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:18 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:26 pm
Jobbo wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:23 pm
It’s not a major disaster due to the massive efforts to keep deaths down. We are on about 1/10th of the expected deaths if there hadn’t been lockdown. Would 10% of the population of the world being wiped out by one new virus seem a major disaster?
Sorry I'm firmly in the not buying it camp. You're all welcome to your opinions but when your own incompetent government finally recognised it's older or ill people that need to take measures it's an admission of over reaction.
You think 4 months of the biggest change to our way of life since WW2 has done nothing?
Yes it's exposed gullible people.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:40 pm
by Broccers
Beany wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:20 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:17 pm
Daily updates from Katie Hopkins on Instagram are where my intel comes from


.
I don't think this was a joke.
You don't think.

Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:56 pm
by Jobbo
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:39 pmYes it's exposed gullible people.
You’re thinking about Brexit again

Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:10 pm
by duncs500
Jobbo wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:56 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:39 pmYes it's exposed gullible people.
You’re thinking about Brexit again

Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:22 pm
by Broccers
Jobbo wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:56 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:39 pmYes it's exposed gullible people.
You’re thinking about Brexit again

No.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:11 am
by Foz
Ascender wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:19 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:17 pm
It's a massive Bloody con. The potential of anything is huge if you use percentages rather than individual dead people who probably died of something else.
Going by some of the places on that list there’s probably a much higher risk of catching some STD than there is COVID.
Hahahahaha
As a resident of said area the rumour mill is in full effect, a French oil worker turned away after a positive test (pre mobilising to offshore) and rather than isolate went on a massive bender.
Who knows, couldn’t be a local
Protect the vulnerable, but we have to get back to some normality, unless we start protecting jobs there will be no NHS as the country goes bankrupt..
I couldn’t help but feel the crushing Irony as I was out having lunch with my boys, getting presented with a bill to go, eh I think you missed half the food #eatouttohelpout as everyone’s phones lit up with news of the lockdown..
We were 20 miles outside town but they fully expected to be closing in case people decided to defy the lockdown and head to the ‘shire.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:29 am
by ZedLeg
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:17 pm
It's a massive Bloody con. The potential of anything is huge if you use percentages rather than individual dead people who probably died of something else.
If it’s a con, what’s the end game?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:57 am
by Ascender
Foz wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:11 am
Ascender wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:19 pm
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:17 pm
It's a massive Bloody con. The potential of anything is huge if you use percentages rather than individual dead people who probably died of something else.
Going by some of the places on that list there’s probably a much higher risk of catching some STD than there is COVID.
Hahahahaha
As a resident of said area the rumour mill is in full effect, a French oil worker turned away after a positive test (pre mobilising to offshore) and rather than isolate went on a massive bender.
Who knows, couldn’t be a local
Protect the vulnerable, but we have to get back to some normality, unless we start protecting jobs there will be no NHS as the country goes bankrupt..
I couldn’t help but feel the crushing Irony as I was out having lunch with my boys, getting presented with a bill to go, eh I think you missed half the food #eatouttohelpout as everyone’s phones lit up with news of the lockdown..
We were 20 miles outside town but they fully expected to be closing in case people decided to defy the lockdown and head to the ‘shire.
Bloody French eh
To be fair, I guess the oil & gas industry due to its nature was always going to be a potential hotspot.
Hopefully it won’t come to anything, but you’re right, we need to get back to normality and there’s been no deaths recently so something has definitely changed.
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:33 am
by Swervin_Mervin
Ascender wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:57 am
there’s been no deaths recently so something has definitely changed.
Has there not? Or has Sturgeon not quite been telling it straight?

Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:33 am
by integrale_evo
ZedLeg wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:29 am
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:17 pm
It's a massive Bloody con. The potential of anything is huge if you use percentages rather than individual dead people who probably died of something else.
If it’s a con, what’s the end game?
And how has every country in the world agreed to this master plan to dupe the entire population for some reason no one has managed to work out?
Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:35 am
by ZedLeg
Must be the same people who’re hiding that the world is flat and reverse engineering alien tech in Nevada

Re: Coronavirus
Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:37 am
by Broccers
integrale_evo wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:33 am
ZedLeg wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 8:29 am
Broccers wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 5:17 pm
It's a massive Bloody con. The potential of anything is huge if you use percentages rather than individual dead people who probably died of something else.
If it’s a con, what’s the end game?
And how has every country in the world agreed to this master plan to dupe the entire population for some reason no one has managed to work out?
Not sure I'll ask Katie
