Re: New shiny: OnePlus 6t
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:13 pm
Hahahaste wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:21 am Of course I am, for the same reasons I don't drink Tesco lager or wear shoes from Next.
Hahahaste wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:21 am Of course I am, for the same reasons I don't drink Tesco lager or wear shoes from Next.
Know we're better.JLv3.0 wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:43 am I'd genuinely forgotten that iPhone people really do think they're better![]()
Give it a whirl. Bizz-nizz is a serious thing. Get it right and you'll be able to upgrade that plastic car for a proper metal one.
Real nerdz change their batteriesMatty wrote: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:56 pmI was having a go on my mates S10e at work. It's nice and all....but I kept thinking, what does it do that my 3-year old Pixel doesn't? Screens a bit nicer, cameras a bit better....but....£700? For that? Pass.DaveE wrote: Mon Mar 18, 2019 1:35 pm I've had a good play with the S10e and that's a cracking phone IMO - could well be my next move. (Although it's a sad sign that now the "cheap" version is over £650.)
I'm only looking at upgrading because my battery struggles to get a full day even though I've set it to be in battery saver mode constantlyotherwise I'd happily keep it.
Woh woah woah,JLv3.0 wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:43 am I'd genuinely forgotten that iPhone people really do think they're better![]()
Ortofon Concorde. Next.JLv3.0 wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 1:01 pm Ah - yep that is true actually
What do you reckon our parents' generation argued about with such fervour? Styluses?
I take your point, and I don't disagree.JLv3.0 wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:40 am Yeah this echoes the points made on the previous page. New phones are just a little bit better than old phones, and just a little bit better doesn't translate to "must chuck a grand at it to have one". Not to me anyway!
It's been a very long day, but off the top of my head I can't really think of anything that is all that similar. Most things I can think of are either better for less money than the item they're replacing (e.g. TVs) or provide either a quantifiable increase in performance, reliability and /or usability (e.g. cars). Phones seem to have plateaued in terms of functionality so the investment doesn't get much return.DaveE wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:12 pm You could level that argument at all sorts of things that we buy, where we do so to gain incremental, not revolutionary benefits now.
Wot JL sez. I think we won't see anything significant until they improve batteries.JLv3.0 wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:30 pmIt's been a very long day, but off the top of my head I can't really think of anything that is all that similar. Most things I can think of are either better for less money than the item they're replacing (e.g. TVs) or provide either a quantifiable increase in performance, reliability and /or usability (e.g. cars). Phones seem to have plateaued in terms of functionality so the investment doesn't get much return.DaveE wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:12 pm You could level that argument at all sorts of things that we buy, where we do so to gain incremental, not revolutionary benefits now.
This is why I kept my Galaxy Note 4 for so long. Nothing else came out that was a significant enough leap forward to make it worth the big outlay. Once the Pixel 2 XL came along I pulled the trigger (Boatshoesc) and I will undoubtedly keep this for quite a while until there is a significant enough improvement in tech.DeskJockey wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:32 pmWot JL sez. I think we won't see anything significant until they improve batteries.JLv3.0 wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:30 pmIt's been a very long day, but off the top of my head I can't really think of anything that is all that similar. Most things I can think of are either better for less money than the item they're replacing (e.g. TVs) or provide either a quantifiable increase in performance, reliability and /or usability (e.g. cars). Phones seem to have plateaued in terms of functionality so the investment doesn't get much return.DaveE wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2019 5:12 pm You could level that argument at all sorts of things that we buy, where we do so to gain incremental, not revolutionary benefits now.
I thought it was an Aus model at first - maaaaate!