Page 3 of 4

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:34 pm
by Barry
NotoriousREV wrote: Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:04 pm She’s definitely crossed the line from vile human to full on swivel-eyed loon.
Never go full retard etc.

For me she's only ever been a shock jock troll, there never was any journalistic integrity to lose.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:53 pm
by NotoriousREV
Barry wrote: Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:34 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:04 pm She’s definitely crossed the line from vile human to full on swivel-eyed loon.
Never go full retard etc.

For me she's only ever been a shock jock troll, there never was any journalistic integrity to lose.
She was never a journalist, she was just someone who failed a job interview for a middle management role at Amstrad.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 3:00 pm
by tim
She's basically Alan Sugar's fault. I'd tweet him and tell him that, but he's already blocked me for telling him something else he didn't like :lol: :lol:

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:48 pm
by Simon
tim wrote: Thu Oct 18, 2018 3:00 pm She's basically Alan Sugar's fault. I'd tweet him and tell him that, but he's already blocked me for telling him something else he didn't like :lol: :lol:
You were saying the Amstrad video phones were shit, weren't you?

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 7:27 pm
by Beany
Surely the e-m@iler is a better target for ridicule?

An answer to a question that not only had nobody asked, but immediately caused them to reel in shock and die from laughter after considering it.


I mean, just...just look at this fucking thing:
Image

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 8:21 am
by Gavin
I remember those, I worked for Dixons I think at the time. I am sure they were £200 or £300, something ridiculous and we sold not a one. They halved in price then went back to the distribution centre.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 2:06 pm
by hoyleyboyley
ste wrote: Wed Oct 17, 2018 3:00 pm
tim wrote: Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:50 pm Exhibit A:



Not Mr JWW, whose content I pretty much universally like, but the other cunt. Watch it through, if you can. I was reaching for the razor blades at "pulled the trigger".

Perhaps I'm just having an off day. :p
Sorry, which one are you finding annoying in particular? The non-bald one seems massively more annoying.
Watched 14 seconds. cunt. :lol:

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 4:21 pm
by Mito Man
Yep. Got to desaturated before calling it quits.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 7:52 pm
by McSwede
Mito Man wrote: Fri Oct 19, 2018 4:21 pm Yep. Got to desaturated before calling it quits.
Annoying cunts!

Who watches this shit??

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 5:48 pm
by nuttinnew
Too many of the people on the road yesterday need to be added to the list; a Golf R estate and Jaaag XF-R Sportbrake (on a different occasion) having to prove they're faster - than 60bhp - by cutting across traffic, using the power where they couldn't really so then having to brake very hard, and then when they were in front they barely maintained the speed limit :roll: A few other 'must be in front' pitas and poop like that, I changed my route home to try and avoid unnecessary situations. It didn't work, a couplefew more things happened so I stopped at a supermarket for a bit of time out. Leaving there the 30mph road was clear so I trundled along, that way if the tight roundabouts were clear I could go round with having to break or change gear. Cue a Transit banzaiing round one on the wrong side. If I'd've done 30 the extra couple of car lengths along would've put me right in the wrong place; I'll take that luck. Enough dodgy things happened that I started to wonder if it was me... Happy and relieved to make it home unscathed yesterday, ridiculous for a bright, warm, dry Saturday afternoon/evening.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:21 pm
by JonMad
tim wrote: Thu Oct 18, 2018 3:00 pm She's basically Alan Sugar's fault. I'd tweet him and tell him that, but he's already blocked me for telling him something else he didn't like :lol: :lol:
I didn't even know she had been on The Apprentice until I read this and looked her up on Wikipedia.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 7:15 pm
by nuttinnew
Who ever changed the heading on BBC from 'radio' to 'sounds'.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 1:27 am
by Coaster1
ZedLeg wrote: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:35 am Jacob Rees Moggs is someone I could happily never stop punching, except that he looks like a sickly child from a victorian novel and I'd probably feel bad.
I actually think he’s one of the better politicians.

Anyway, my current list:

People who say ‘Not gonna lie...’

Most of the contestants in this series of the Apprentice.

The dickhead who flashed the headlights at me when I was having a bit of fun in my 996 at a clear NSL road on Wednesday.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:12 am
by NotoriousREV
Coaster1 wrote: Fri Oct 26, 2018 1:27 am
ZedLeg wrote: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:35 am Jacob Rees Moggs is someone I could happily never stop punching, except that he looks like a sickly child from a victorian novel and I'd probably feel bad.
I actually think he’s one of the better politicians.

I’d love to hear your reasoning behind that one.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 9:16 am
by ZedLeg
Not gonna lie, I'm quite curious myself.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:32 pm
by Beany
NotoriousREV wrote: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:12 am
Coaster1 wrote: Fri Oct 26, 2018 1:27 am
ZedLeg wrote: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:35 am Jacob Rees Moggs is someone I could happily never stop punching, except that he looks like a sickly child from a victorian novel and I'd probably feel bad.
I actually think he’s one of the better politicians.

I’d love to hear your reasoning behind that one.
Delusional thinking?

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:04 pm
by Broccers
Rees Mog is fantastic.


Owen Jones - seconded. Hes from sheffield tha nose - not that he sounds it. :D

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:30 pm
by Swervin_Mervin
I don't get the hate either. Not that I'm saying I'm a fan, but for a politician I can think of a fair old few that I despise more.

I suspect most of the hate directed his way (and I'm not suggesting by those on here) is because he's well spoken, so a toff. Good ol' inverse snobbery.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:48 pm
by ZedLeg
Aye, it must be class envy.

Or he's a very regressive christian fundamentalist who's been rumoured to be using his position to make a killing betting against Brexit going well.

Re: People Whose Heads You Want To Stove In Just For Existing

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:51 pm
by Swervin_Mervin
A self-serving politician you say? Well I never... :lol:

So it's just that he's a bit too religious then?