No speed limits, 250 hp minimum, banked curves, buried in a cut so no cross winds…
Oh and several tunnels for the V8,10 and 12 drivers.
And finally, No electric vehicles
Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
So you'd allow a 2t+ SUV but not a Lotus Elise?
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Yes - this is extended drag race / max speed road.
Elise owners have north Wales (when plod’s not about). Their racing dynamics would be lost on my road
Or you could make your own road with no straights longer than 400 yards…
Elise owners have north Wales (when plod’s not about). Their racing dynamics would be lost on my road
Or you could make your own road with no straights longer than 400 yards…

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Make it a toll road but base it on time taken.
Sub 1 minute from one end to the other = £1
Every additional minute taken will be a further £10 on top.
That'll sort the wheat from the chavs.
Sub 1 minute from one end to the other = £1
Every additional minute taken will be a further £10 on top.
That'll sort the wheat from the chavs.
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Anyone else thinking about the loop in Hard Drivin'?mik wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 2:53 pm @dinny_g as it's your road, will you be adding any special features to relieve boredom such as an homage to Alton Towers Corkscrew?
![]()

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Mito Man wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 7:17 pm Make it a toll road but base it on time taken.
Sub 1 minute from one end to the other = £1
Every additional minute taken will be a further £10 on top.
That'll sort the wheat from the chavs.
Like it!! You can be Director of Operations
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
It has been 20 years since I lived in dat der London, but at the time, I was staggered by the lack of knowledge about the rest of the UK, from colleagues who were Essex/London born.
For us away up North it is being told that our taxes should go to a "nationally beneficial" project, like HS2 or Crossrail etc. I very much doubt many people north of Watford see much benefit.
I do agree that the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" attitude is rife in the UK though, just read the cmments about any expenditure by a Council or overnment dept.
Maybe it is just the huge rip off for taxpayers that is the most galling, hand drier example as a case in point. Or NHS staff being forced to requisition what is a £10 phone trhough a contract that charges £100.
For us away up North it is being told that our taxes should go to a "nationally beneficial" project, like HS2 or Crossrail etc. I very much doubt many people north of Watford see much benefit.
I do agree that the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" attitude is rife in the UK though, just read the cmments about any expenditure by a Council or overnment dept.

Maybe it is just the huge rip off for taxpayers that is the most galling, hand drier example as a case in point. Or NHS staff being forced to requisition what is a £10 phone trhough a contract that charges £100.
- Gavster
- Posts: 3874
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
- Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Pride before a fallGavster wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:32 pm Great news, also the Silvertown tunnel opens soon, which should make a big difference around this part of town

Silvertown tunnel opened at the weekend, with a £4 toll each way during peak hours (£1.50 off peak), at the same time they slapped precisely the same toll on the Blackwall tunnel. This toll is steep, it means that commuters would need to pay an additional £8 per day to use either of those tunnels. As a result, both tunnels are really clear and quiet, because it seems everyone is trying to use the free crossings at Rotherhite, Woolwich ferry or Tower bridge instead.
I had to go through Rotherhithe tunnel yesterday and the whole area was gridlocked from all directions, and that's during school holidays when it's normally be quieter. So the new tunnel has actually made congestion worse

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
I’m sure that’s all part of the master plan.
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
School holidays seem to start next week round here so it might not be full holiday period yet. Other than that, it sounds utterly ineffectual - great.
Also, if you’re going to build a new tunnel why make the southern portal in almost exactly the same location as an existing tunnel?
Also, if you’re going to build a new tunnel why make the southern portal in almost exactly the same location as an existing tunnel?