Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by dinny_g »

No speed limits, 250 hp minimum, banked curves, buried in a cut so no cross winds…

Oh and several tunnels for the V8,10 and 12 drivers.

And finally, No electric vehicles
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 5944
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by DeskJockey »

So you'd allow a 2t+ SUV but not a Lotus Elise?
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by dinny_g »

Yes - this is extended drag race / max speed road.

Elise owners have north Wales (when plod’s not about). Their racing dynamics would be lost on my road

Or you could make your own road with no straights longer than 400 yards… :lol:
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12149
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Mito Man »

Make it a toll road but base it on time taken.
Sub 1 minute from one end to the other = £1
Every additional minute taken will be a further £10 on top.

That'll sort the wheat from the chavs.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5551
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by duncs500 »

mik wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 2:53 pm @dinny_g as it's your road, will you be adding any special features to relieve boredom such as an homage to Alton Towers Corkscrew?

Image
Anyone else thinking about the loop in Hard Drivin'? :D
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by dinny_g »

Mito Man wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 7:17 pm Make it a toll road but base it on time taken.
Sub 1 minute from one end to the other = £1
Every additional minute taken will be a further £10 on top.

That'll sort the wheat from the chavs.

Like it!! You can be Director of Operations
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Gavin
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm
Currently Driving: Audi S5, R56 Cooper S

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Gavin »

It has been 20 years since I lived in dat der London, but at the time, I was staggered by the lack of knowledge about the rest of the UK, from colleagues who were Essex/London born.

For us away up North it is being told that our taxes should go to a "nationally beneficial" project, like HS2 or Crossrail etc. I very much doubt many people north of Watford see much benefit.

I do agree that the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" attitude is rife in the UK though, just read the cmments about any expenditure by a Council or overnment dept. :D
Maybe it is just the huge rip off for taxpayers that is the most galling, hand drier example as a case in point. Or NHS staff being forced to requisition what is a £10 phone trhough a contract that charges £100.
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3874
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Gavster »

Gavster wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 8:32 pm Great news, also the Silvertown tunnel opens soon, which should make a big difference around this part of town
Pride before a fall :lol:

Silvertown tunnel opened at the weekend, with a £4 toll each way during peak hours (£1.50 off peak), at the same time they slapped precisely the same toll on the Blackwall tunnel. This toll is steep, it means that commuters would need to pay an additional £8 per day to use either of those tunnels. As a result, both tunnels are really clear and quiet, because it seems everyone is trying to use the free crossings at Rotherhite, Woolwich ferry or Tower bridge instead.

I had to go through Rotherhithe tunnel yesterday and the whole area was gridlocked from all directions, and that's during school holidays when it's normally be quieter. So the new tunnel has actually made congestion worse :? it's only going to be a matter of time before all of the crossings east of Tower Bridge have tolls to balance things out.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12149
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Mito Man »

I’m sure that’s all part of the master plan.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12157
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Jobbo »

School holidays seem to start next week round here so it might not be full holiday period yet. Other than that, it sounds utterly ineffectual - great.

Also, if you’re going to build a new tunnel why make the southern portal in almost exactly the same location as an existing tunnel?
Post Reply