Page 3 of 4

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 12:30 pm
by JLv3.0
This presenting chap is very knowledgeable and seems to be a top chap! Is he new?!! 8-)

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 12:33 pm
by mik
I think he is the technical director for one of the F1 teams. Or NASA.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 12:36 pm
by GG.
Even with the sound off all you can see is his hyperextended tongue darting in and out between his teeth like a Gene Simmons tribute act engaging in televised cunnilingus.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 12:49 pm
by mik
As a side question - what utter b4stard created the word "lisp" - when sufferers can't pronounce it? :?

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 12:50 pm
by Jobbo
GG. wrote: Fri May 11, 2018 12:36 pm Even with the sound off all you can see is his hyperextended tongue darting in and out between his teeth like a Gene Simmons tribute act engaging in televised cunnilingus.
Even before clicking on the video, I get that image from the still :(

ETA: Mik, it was Jonathan Ross's parents.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 1:01 pm
by NotoriousREV
Jobbo wrote: Fri May 11, 2018 12:50 pm
GG. wrote: Fri May 11, 2018 12:36 pm Even with the sound off all you can see is his hyperextended tongue darting in and out between his teeth like a Gene Simmons tribute act engaging in televised cunnilingus.
Even before clicking on the video, I get that image from the still :(

ETA: Mik, it was Jonathan Ross's parents.
When Jonathan Ross says “wrong”, is it the w or the r that’s silent? 🤔

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 1:03 pm
by GG.
mik wrote: Fri May 11, 2018 12:49 pm As a side question - what utter b4stard created the word "lisp" - when sufferers can't pronounce it? :?
I think, in this particular case, we are the ones suffering.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 11, 2018 1:08 pm
by mik
I was commenting to Ross recently that his Shmeeee description dissapeared into the ether with the loss of the forum. It probably needs resurrecting on this site at some point. (Along with the Nick Cage one) :)

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 9:58 am
by JLv3.0
'lispy hard-on', wasn't it :lol:

And the wonderful, timeless 'pensive retard' for Cage.

Ross FTMFW 8-)

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 10:59 am
by mik
I believe it was "nursing a lispy hard-on". Which is even betterer. :)

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 1:07 pm
by JLv3.0
That's the one Michael :lol: - seriously Ross has had me in tears of laughter at various times.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Sun May 13, 2018 7:05 pm
by Maurice
Aww shucks, you guys.

I quite like the Cullinan - clearly it’s massively ostentatious but then so is a Phantom and it’s nowhere near as a tacky as the Urus.

It does look like it’s incredibly colour sensitive, however. Black is a no-no for fear of the aforementioned taxi resemblance, but perhaps a lovely shade of doom blue would look good.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 2:21 pm
by Richard
Alex_ wrote: Thu May 10, 2018 5:56 pm I've seen a few Bentaygas now and they look decent. Part of me wants one.
I think the same. Everyone was being sick when they saw those first

It’ll be the same with the Cullinan

I’m interested in seeing how well the cope off road. The videos they’ve shot suggest they’ll be able to do the business over and above what people will use it for (muddy fields, maybe some sand, snow)

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 2:28 pm
by Rich B
Richard wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 2:21 pmI’m interested in seeing how well the cope off road. The videos they’ve shot suggest they’ll be able to do the business over and above what people will use it for (muddy fields, maybe some sand, snow)
Why?

There’ll be plenty seeing sand, but I doubt many will ever even live outside, let alone see mud.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 2:45 pm
by Swervin_Mervin
That is nowhere near as hateful as the Bentayga. Just a terrible side profile shot in raised mode.

Of course JL is correct as well, in that the wheels should remain central to the arches horizontally. For a manufacturer that obsessed with self-levelling RR logos in the wheels, this should be a formality.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 4:49 pm
by mik
Depends on the suspension of course - i have no idea what it actually has, but if it uses trailing arms at the rear for example you will struggle to do keep the wheel centred when you raise it up - unless you move the pivot point too.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 5:21 pm
by Rich B
mik wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 4:49 pm Depends on the suspension of course - i have no idea what it actually has, but if it uses trailing arms at the rear for example you will struggle to do keep the wheel centred when you raise it up - unless you move the pivot point too.
RR of old would have done whatever it took to ensure perfection. This is just slapdash. They’ll be raiding the parts bin for prominent switchgear next.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 5:43 pm
by JLv3.0
Rich B wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 2:28 pm
Richard wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 2:21 pmI’m interested in seeing how well the cope off road. The videos they’ve shot suggest they’ll be able to do the business over and above what people will use it for (muddy fields, maybe some sand, snow)
Why?

There’ll be plenty seeing sand, but I doubt many will ever even live outside, let alone see mud.


Turn the sound off to avoid the horrible voiceover.

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 5:53 pm
by Swervin_Mervin
Rich B wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 5:21 pm
mik wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 4:49 pm Depends on the suspension of course - i have no idea what it actually has, but if it uses trailing arms at the rear for example you will struggle to do keep the wheel centred when you raise it up - unless you move the pivot point too.
RR of old would have done whatever it took to ensure perfection. This is just slapdash. They’ll be raiding the parts bin for prominent switchgear next.
This

Re: RR Cullinan

Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 7:16 am
by ShockDiamonds
Reserving judgement until I see one on the road. Although would at least agree that it looks better lowered, not raised. That’s true of all road cars IMHO.