Page 16 of 20

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:05 pm
by Rich B
then more will go to jail. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:09 pm
by ZedLeg
There's that sneer :lol:

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:34 pm
by Rich B
It’s not as though the law isn’t clear. if sneering is not having sympathy with people intentionally breaking the law knowing they’ll go to jail, then i guess i’m cyril sneer.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:35 pm
by ZedLeg
It's not a case of sympathy imo, prison in this instance is a big expensive waste of time all round. Would be much better to have them doing something productive.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:44 pm
by Rich B
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:35 pm It's not a case of sympathy imo, prison in this instance is a big expensive waste of time all round. Would be much better to have them doing something productive.
like what? they openly break the law knowing the consequences. Any other “punishment” will just be abused for getting attention too.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 12:46 pm
by ZedLeg
So? As long as they're doing the thing who cares. The thing could be cleaning graffiti or whatever. The stuff that people on community orders usually do.

If they aren't breaking the law to get attention for their cause what's the problem?

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:18 pm
by Simon
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 11:48 am It's a stretch to say frames are part of the artwork. Painters rarely sell their work framed. Also they didn't deliberately damage them.
Read the sentencing remarks linked above - the judge made a good point about the frame.

And I'd argue they definitely did deliberately damage the frame - they threw the soup not knowing if the picture was even protected by glass (see judges comments again) so clearly and damage is deliberate.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:26 pm
by dinny_g
Section s.57 of the Sentencing Code lists five purposes of sentencing:

Number 1 and 2 are as follows:
  • To punish the offender – this can include going to prison, doing unpaid work in the community, obeying a curfew or paying a fine.
  • To reduce crime – by preventing the offender from committing more crime, and putting others off from committing similar offences.
A community service order may achieve number 1 but it would NOT achieve number 2 - that's why this sentence has not been used in this case

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:39 pm
by ZedLeg
I was just saying what I would prefer.

Using prisons as warehouses for thousands of petty criminals doesn't seem to be working out that well for us.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:40 pm
by Rich B
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:39 pm Nothing will stop protestors from protesting though.
prison seems to do the job pretty well.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:42 pm
by ZedLeg
I forget how much liberals love prisons sometimes tbh :lol:

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:46 pm
by ZedLeg
Worth bearing in mind that 2 years is more than the guy we're discussing in the youtube thread got.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:48 pm
by Rich B
if you deliberately choose to publicly do a crime with prison time in its sentencing guidelines, don’t be surprised if you get sentenced to prison time.

Find a better way to protest.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm
by ZedLeg
No one is surprised Rich, they're arguing that the length of sentences aren't representative of the crime.

I personally don't think they should have gone to prison but who the fuck cares what I think.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:53 pm
by mik
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:46 pm Worth bearing in mind that 2 years is more than the guy we're discussing in the youtube thread got.
Funnily enough TSB posted this yesterday too (previous poster not making reference to Mr Pollitt obviously)


Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:54 pm
by Rich B
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm No one is surprised Rich, they're arguing that the length of sentences aren't representative of the crime.

I personally don't think they should have gone to prison but who the fuck cares what I think.
What else could the judges do? if they go lenient, there’ll be hoards of people blocking the M25 and vandalising every priceless artwork by dinner time. All of them citing the cases of how the last people only got community service.

they’ve forced the hand of the authorities - they have to get the most the crimes can get or it’ll just be a green light for more. the M25 guys said in court that they’ll just do it again when released…

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:55 pm
by dinny_g
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm but who the fuck cares what I think.
I care what you think because there seems to be a hell of a lot of people who think they way that you do. We all have to try see all sides of a problem or debate or difference because otherwise, we just end up being entrenched.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:56 pm
by ZedLeg
Aye, my thing is that warehousing thousands of petty non violent criminals can't be helping this prison crisis we keep hearing about. We just gave a load of prisoners early release to make space.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:57 pm
by ZedLeg
Rich B wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:54 pm
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm No one is surprised Rich, they're arguing that the length of sentences aren't representative of the crime.

I personally don't think they should have gone to prison but who the fuck cares what I think.
What else could the judges do? if they go lenient, there’ll be hoards of people blocking the M25 and vandalising every priceless artwork by dinner time. All of them citing the cases of how the last people only got community service.

they’ve forced the hand of the authorities - they have to get the most the crimes can get or it’ll just be a green light for more. the M25 guys said in court that they’ll just do it again when released…
That's my point though, everyone knows that the sentences aren't going to stop the protests, give them work that makes a difference in the community so at least they're giving something back in between wasting folk's time.

Re: The Protest Thread.

Posted: Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:02 pm
by Rich B
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:57 pm
Rich B wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:54 pm
ZedLeg wrote: Tue Oct 01, 2024 1:49 pm No one is surprised Rich, they're arguing that the length of sentences aren't representative of the crime.

I personally don't think they should have gone to prison but who the fuck cares what I think.
What else could the judges do? if they go lenient, there’ll be hoards of people blocking the M25 and vandalising every priceless artwork by dinner time. All of them citing the cases of how the last people only got community service.

they’ve forced the hand of the authorities - they have to get the most the crimes can get or it’ll just be a green light for more. the M25 guys said in court that they’ll just do it again when released…
That's my point though, everyone knows that the sentences aren't going to stop the protests, give them work that makes a difference in the community so at least they're giving something back in between wasting folk's time.
they just won’t do it. They’ll not turn up - the authorities will waste thousands trying to enforce them to do it and they’ll turn it into another twitter photo opportunity.

how are they going to paint fences when they’re chained to a motorway gantry?