For the FTAO of JL

User avatar
Foz
Posts: 1330
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2018 7:57 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Foz »

JLv3.0 wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:31 am Self-drive mate? Can't help tbh but they will all be fairly off-leash as that's the only way to drive in the sand!

If it's a driver tour, then I'm totally out of date so head over to Tripadvisor to see who gets good ratings.

Not much help, am I :lol:
Just take his 4X4 and try not to roll it 😀
User avatar
GG.
Posts: 5570
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by GG. »

Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:52 am
GG. wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:44 am
nuttinnew wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2019 12:55 am Image
LOL - that's so mangled its starting to look like a Captcha version of a number plate.

Speedster humps, smoked lights and non-factory wing :evil:
i only just realised the “A” has been dicked with to look like a “4”! 😂
Double dicked as well :lol: yellow screw at the bottom of the A and another random black headed screw to the right hand side. Awful.

P9 HCA doesn't turn up on the DVLA register either so maybe it is even more doctored than it looks.
User avatar
ste
Posts: 877
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by ste »

That 53 NNA plate is ace. 8-)

Needs to be on an NSX though.
User avatar
Sundayjumper
Posts: 8076
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:04 pm
Currently Driving: Peugeot 406 replica, jaaaag, beetle, tractor

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Sundayjumper »

GG. wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:58 am P9 HCA doesn't turn up on the DVLA register either so maybe it is even more doctored than it looks.
Old pic ? If it's been put on retention it won't show up on the usual MOT check etc.

Found the owner though:

http://www.911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=70 ... 4e5ab1fc40
User avatar
Barry
Posts: 1767
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:59 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Barry »

Saw this unusual Porsche today:

Image
User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by JLv3.0 »

You plonker Baz - it's clearly a Ginetta of some sort.
User avatar
scotta
Posts: 3540
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by scotta »

F31 3 Series HE11 FFS.
User avatar
Richard
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Richard »

What do we think this chap was aiming for?

Image
Last edited by Richard on Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
scotta
Posts: 3540
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by scotta »

Richard wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:16 pm What do we think this chap was aiming for?

Image
Probably nobody to nick his bike?
User avatar
Richard
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Richard »

J8EBA

JBEBA

J BEBA

J BEE-BAH

Justin Beiber!?!?

I’ve solved it
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12083
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Mito Man »

Jabba. The car does resemble it.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Richard
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Richard »

Mito Man wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:26 pm Jabba. The car does resemble it.
Also possible
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12062
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Jobbo »

From when JL used Facebook.
Image
User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by JLv3.0 »

I'd forgotten about that!! :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Richard
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Richard »

Image

I wouldn’t have predicted T9 being on a 318i
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10724
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by nuttinnew »

^ I'd've shortened the backing; iirc the regs are about the margin size from the letters, not the overall size of the backing.


Spotted on a random white Berlingo; BK11 OCS. It's probably the original reg, and closer to a certain exclamation than many plates that are trying hard to say the same thing.
IanF
Posts: 3512
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e
Contact:

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by IanF »

Caterhams are a lot bigger IRL

Image
Cheers,

Ian
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12083
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Mito Man »

Chunky Dunky edition.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11480
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by Rich B »

IanF wrote: Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:38 am Caterhams are a lot bigger IRL

Image
A bit more suitable for taking a dog for a walk round the track though! A caterham would have been blown away if it went down there over the last few days!
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5536
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: For the FTAO of JL

Post by duncs500 »

8-)
Post Reply