OV9

No, but then what is?

True but I still think the P1 GTR looked the business and practically an oil painting compared to the Senna.

True, but then what isn't?

I like it, it's purposeful.

Mito Man wrote: Tue May 29, 2018 12:13 pm 12C is also the best looking McLaren IMO with the most cohesive design. After the 12C they bastardised the design to make it fit the corporate logo and P1 front and after that they sent every subsequent car to the ugly tree to have every stick thrown at it by the wind tunnel.

Err 675LT is stunning. End of. Thread closed.

duncs500 wrote: Tue May 29, 2018 7:27 pm

Mito Man wrote: Tue May 29, 2018 12:13 pm 12C is also the best looking McLaren IMO with the most cohesive design. After the 12C they bastardised the design to make it fit the corporate logo and P1 front and after that they sent every subsequent car to the ugly tree to have every stick thrown at it by the wind tunnel.

Err 675LT is stunning. End of. Thread closed.

LOL, good one!

Oh, you weren't joking.

You lot are weird.

duncs500 wrote: Tue May 29, 2018 7:53 pm You lot are weird.

They are. The LT is immense.

675LT is perfect. JLaDIC

Meh I've been called worse

JL and Duncs 'is' correct

I got that mate

The LT is a bit chinny but it's definitely the best of a bad lot .

The original F1 is still the best looking car they've ever made. It's just one of those cars that looks right.

I was looking a photos of the 650 last week.

It really was the most handsome Macca production car.

GG. wrote: Tue May 29, 2018 12:33 pm
This is also amusing:

xviii) Loss directly or indirectly caused by (or contributed to by or arising from) any nuclear fuel or from any nuclear waste from the combustion of nuclear fuel.

Does xix state loss directly or indirectly by the usage of, or attempted usage of, coal or other non-refined fossil fuels? Makes me think I should read all the T&Cs for the Porsche

And I guess this means Doc Brown won't be using McLarens any time soon.

ShockDiamonds wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 12:19 pm

GG. wrote: Tue May 29, 2018 12:33 pm
This is also amusing:

xviii) Loss directly or indirectly caused by (or contributed to by or arising from) any nuclear fuel or from any nuclear waste from the combustion of nuclear fuel.

Does xix state loss directly or indirectly by the usage of, or attempted usage of, coal or other non-refined fossil fuels? Makes me think I should read all the T&Cs for the Porsche

And I guess this means Doc Brown won't be using McLarens any time soon.

That is a rather bizarre disclaimer. Can't even blame a translation error!
I wouldn't trust anyone who discusses "combusting" a nuclear fuel either...

I haven't been enamoured with any McLaren design, but the 675LT is the best of a mediocre bunch with the Senna off the scale fugly.
The "push to drink" feature is just the icing on the very pretentious cake.

Ferrari manage to combine aesthetic and aural appeal with their function. McLaren have yet to achieve that in my Ferrari fanboi opinion.
<cue tirade of posts accusing me of being a Ferrari fanboi even though I've literally just said I am>

It’s even more odd having a push to drink system in a car which isn’t primarily designed for the track seeing as they made a track version specific Senna. Which is also fvcking odd as the track only Senna wasn’t designed in mind with participating in any race series.

At least when Ferrari do this shit they have their own Ferrari Challenge and 1 make races.

Ferrari fanboi w@nker!

ZedLeg wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 10:35 am The LT is a bit chinny but it's definitely the best of a bad lot .

The original F1 is still the best looking car they've ever made. It's just one of those cars that looks right.

It looks utterly dull.