Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:26 pm
by Simon
Poor kiddo, that would've stung a bit.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:32 pm
by mik
I did that aged approximately 7 trying to ride my big sisters bike - which was way too big for me. I was staring down at my feet trying to get them on the pedals properly, and when I looked up there was a parked car about 20mm in front of me. I remember that it hurt.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:51 pm
by V8Granite
This is how they learn.
Stem to the bellend or stem to the balls, it never ends well.
Dave!
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 2:12 pm
by Gavster
a) The name of that IG account lol
b) 7.1m followers
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 6:33 pm
by nuttinnew
It may stop him doing this;
or this;
Gavster wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 2:12 pm
a) The name of that IG account lol
b) 7.1m followers
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 7:01 am
by nuttinnew
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 8:59 am
by Beany
Cyclists fault.
For not realising they were following an Audi, so it'd be a coin flip as to whether the driver was a raging cunt who'd selfishly cause problems for everyone around them through their own arrogance and stupidity.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:18 am
by mik
Car presumably stops as one of the cyclists ahead of it has an issue?
Regardless - cyclists fault. (Appears to be looking-down to find his clip-in pedals?)
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:49 am
by Ascender
Yip, cyclist is looking at his feet rather than ahead. Which seems mental given he's in a pack of 3 or 4.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:08 am
by Jobbo
All the cyclists should have gone round the car into the cyclists' box - wouldn't have happened then. To be fair, he'd have probably made an aggressive attempt to run them over
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:59 pm
by Ascender
Had the same thought... Those cyclist boxes are very triggering for many drivers!
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 3:16 pm
by mik
Not a cycle - looks like a nutcracker
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:55 pm
by jamcg
Not a cyclist, but couldn’t think of a better thread to place for judgement. Bin man could have looked, van driver could have had patience.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:01 pm
by Beany
Imagine approaching an active bin lorry and not thinking "wow, someone might step out from there"
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:27 pm
by nuttinnew
Ouch
"Why you coming fast?"
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2025 9:32 am
by Jobbo
Beany wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:01 pm
Imagine approaching an active bin lorry and not thinking "wow, someone might step out from there"
The binman was visible - why would the van driver think he would decide to step out into the clear lane where vehicles could pass? Binman was a bit lacking in self-preservation instinct. The van driver wasn't going very fast - he stopped in less than 20ft.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Beany wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:01 pm
Imagine approaching an active bin lorry and not thinking "wow, someone might step out from there"
The binman was visible - why would the van driver think he would decide to step out into the clear lane where vehicles could pass? Binman was a bit lacking in self-preservation instinct. The van driver wasn't going very fast - he stopped in less than 20ft.
The van driver can see that there are workers active - when the bin comes down the worker is going either left or right… this is a good time to be hyper cautious.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2025 10:25 am
by ZedLeg
My view on stuff like that is how impatient do you have to be to not give the guy a minute to do his job?
Having had someone pull out on me at least once a day all last week, I’m acutely aware of how impatient and oblivious drivers can be.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Beany wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:01 pm
Imagine approaching an active bin lorry and not thinking "wow, someone might step out from there"
The binman was visible - why would the van driver think he would decide to step out into the clear lane where vehicles could pass? Binman was a bit lacking in self-preservation instinct. The van driver wasn't going very fast - he stopped in less than 20ft.
The van driver can see that there are workers active - when the bin comes down the worker is going either left or right… this is a good time to be hyper cautious.
You or I would have, but I'm not sure the van driver was legally at fault here.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
The binman was visible - why would the van driver think he would decide to step out into the clear lane where vehicles could pass? Binman was a bit lacking in self-preservation instinct. The van driver wasn't going very fast - he stopped in less than 20ft.
The van driver can see that there are workers active - when the bin comes down the worker is going either left or right… this is a good time to be hyper cautious.
You or I would have, but I'm not sure the van driver was legally at fault here.
With the pedestrian in the road already, does it not fall into the hierarchy of users for the van to be cautious approaching him?