Page 66 of 78

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 3:35 pm
by MikeHunt
nuttinnew wrote: Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:45 pm
I hope he played the lottery that night.

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:35 pm
by nuttinnew
He certainly did better than the chap in the clip after...

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:35 pm
by nuttinnew

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2024 5:20 pm
by nuttinnew
They click through ok :roll:



Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2024 5:37 pm
by Beany
the first one you can click through to, the second one absolutely you can't because it's tagged as violent (it's a scooter rider getting knocked off and falling down a storm drain) - you'll need to quote, copy the link and paste to a new tab to see it.

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2024 6:10 pm
by nuttinnew
Post check fail :oops:

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2025 6:28 pm
by nuttinnew

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 11:31 am
by jamcg
Local compensation company (Atha and co if you’re interested) have started advertising on the radio directly for getting compensation for cyclists “was a poorly designed cycle lane to blame” etc

Given some of the scummers that ride on the wrong side of the road doing wheelies in my area I bet there’s a few going to be throwing themselves infront of cars soon

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 11:34 am
by dinny_g
The "blame, claim, compensation" industry is going to come back to haunt us all eventually.

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 11:41 am
by mik
Yep. And pedestrians jumping in front of cyclists will be next.

1. Far lower risk than stepping out in front of a car.
2. Easy to use the “doesn’t matter what I did - I am higher risk so you must take care of me” approach that cyclists have pushed successfully
3. Don’t even need to steal a bike to participate.

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 6:19 pm
by ZedLeg
The risk may be lower but if I hit someone on my bike it’s gonna fuck them up.

Also I’m not insured so where the claim going? Sue me personally?

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:28 pm
by mik
ZedLeg wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 6:19 pm
Also I’m not insured so where the claim going? Sue me personally?
Where there’s blame there’s a claim. Pedestrians are more vulnerable - cyclists must ensure their safety.

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:44 pm
by nuttinnew
Interesting concept if you're not legally obliged to use a cycle lane. Probably banging fook out of the "not fit for use/purpose" drum (drummers, lmk what riddim you'd do it in).

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:44 pm
by nuttinnew

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:43 pm
by mik
100% driver fault. Cyclist enters the roundabout almost a full second before the van reaches their give way line - I assume they were looking to their right only (?)

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 10:33 pm
by jamcg
That’s another one where a little bit of self preservation would have helped.

Legally the van driver is culpable and is indeed a cunt. Regardless of wether the cyclist should have waited or not vans not looking at the road ahead and has hit a bloke in a bike

However these videos just make me wish cyclists would learn that it’s better to do something you shouldn’t have to and be safe. Yes it’s not what should happen, and many people will say this is victim blaming but it’s not intended as such. It’s just wishing cyclists would change mindset from “I’m the vulnerable road user, I have right of way” to “everyone is trying to kill me”

Is much rather see a video of “if I hadn’t waited that cunt of a bus driver would have killed me there” than “watch a bus driver not give way to me and snap my spine in 26 places”

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 6:31 am
by Jobbo
With a mini roundabout you have to give way to vehicles approaching it, not just those on it. So not 100% the van’s fault though it didn’t look like he slowed down at all.

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 7:23 am
by Rich B
yeah, some self preservation would have helped. if he’d looked to his right he would have definitely seen the van coming and easily been able to stop. The van was driving WAY too fast onto the roundabout though.

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 11:38 am
by ZedLeg
mik wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:28 pm
ZedLeg wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 6:19 pm
Also I’m not insured so where the claim going? Sue me personally?
Where there’s blame there’s a claim. Pedestrians are more vulnerable - cyclists must ensure their safety.
People can sue me personally if they want, I have fuck all :lol:

FWIW I've never deliberately hit a pedestrian.

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:51 am
by jamcg
The red car literally came out of nowhere, he didn’t stand a chance