Re: Twitter
Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2024 4:45 pm
As long as it comes out of Twitter's liquid assets, who cares 

Ferguson based his assessment on internal second-quarter figures recently obtained by the New York Times. According to this report, X booked $114 million worth of revenue in the U.S., its largest market by far. This represented a 25% drop over the preceding three months and a 53% drop over the year-ago period.
That already sounds bad. But it gets worse. The last publicly available figures prior to Musk’s acquisition, from Q2 of 2022, had revenue at $661 million. After you account for inflation, revenue has actually collapsed by 84%, in today’s dollars.
No one knows how much longer X can survive, since the company doesn’t release financial results. But in November, Musk himself admitted X could face bankruptcy due to the advertiser boycott.
Since then all talk about reaching cash flow breakeven, let alone turning an actual profit, has ceased. In and of itself this is unusual for someone like Musk, who is comfortable announcing targets so aggressive and unrealistic that he repeatedly fails to meet them.
But Simon, he's a billionaire, that means he knows better than us...Simon wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 10:26 pm Maybe being an outspoken fascist cunt isn't the look that advertisers want on the platform? Who knew?
Very goodGavster wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 7:54 am I mean, it's not rocket science and he's done alright with that.
i liked that too!Sundayjumper wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 9:10 amVery goodGavster wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 7:54 am I mean, it's not rocket science and he's done alright with that.![]()
Great news.Beany wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 5:58 pm More on the whole FAFO train:
https://fortune.com/2024/08/15/elon-mus ... -ferguson/
Ferguson based his assessment on internal second-quarter figures recently obtained by the New York Times. According to this report, X booked $114 million worth of revenue in the U.S., its largest market by far. This represented a 25% drop over the preceding three months and a 53% drop over the year-ago period.
That already sounds bad. But it gets worse. The last publicly available figures prior to Musk’s acquisition, from Q2 of 2022, had revenue at $661 million. After you account for inflation, revenue has actually collapsed by 84%, in today’s dollars.
No one knows how much longer X can survive, since the company doesn’t release financial results. But in November, Musk himself admitted X could face bankruptcy due to the advertiser boycott.
Since then all talk about reaching cash flow breakeven, let alone turning an actual profit, has ceased. In and of itself this is unusual for someone like Musk, who is comfortable announcing targets so aggressive and unrealistic that he repeatedly fails to meet them.
I think the expression is "living in blissful ignorance"?Matty wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 1:43 pm Before X I lived on blissful ignorance of the level of moronity that existed.
Yeah, it's a good point tbf. I hear that some of the right wing weirdos have gone full nutter on there since Musk gave them free reign to exercise 'free speech'.Mito Man wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 1:11 pm Sometimes my twitter changes from 'following' to 'for you' and it really is full of bat shit crazy people. However I think that ironically it's even more useful for government surveillance now. Before any extremists would get banned. Now everyone has this false comfort that it's free speech and anything goes. I don't think nearly as many of those people in the UK spouting bollocks during the riots would have done so or been able to under the old regime. So Musk in saving everyone from the big government backed tech world and giving everyone a voice, no matter how extreme, has just exposed them.
The only reason SpaceX has done well is that Musk has been kept the fuck away from it - it has a decent leadership of its own, and Musks batshit crazy ramblings aren't likely to deter it's core customer base. Look at Twitters collapse and Tesla's falling sales to see the current real 'Musk effect'.Gavster wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 7:54 am I occasionally pop onto Twitter to see how many bots have followed me, it's usually around 65% bots to 35% real followers. It still completely bends my brain that he took the worst social media platform and made it far, far worse. I mean, it's not rocket science and he's done alright with that.