RR Cullinan

User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 8974
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by nuttinnew »

JLv3.0 wrote: Thu May 10, 2018 4:10 pm Cue the predictable Allegro Vanden Plas pic from me. Horrible.

So meh you cba to put a pic up :lol:


GG. wrote: Thu May 10, 2018 6:05 pm
Alex_ wrote: Thu May 10, 2018 5:56 pm I've seen a few Bentaygas now and they look decent. Part of me wants one.
Which part? If its not important I would cut it off before the rot spreads.
:lol: Excellent :D



John wrote: Thu May 10, 2018 7:03 pm
Ssangyong designer wrote: That is perfect 8-)


:D
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by NotoriousREV »

Image
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 8974
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by nuttinnew »

Perfect! :lol:
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9713
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by Rich B »

To confirm, this is not approved by me.
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 4781
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by DeskJockey »

It looks awful. How that got signed off is beyond me.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by JLv3.0 »

Because it's huge, vulgar, tacky, flashy and preposterously expensive.

Who do you think it's targeted at Alex? :lol:
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9713
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by Rich B »

I just can’t see past that rear wheel being so offset in the arch. Regardless of if it’s in some super duper offroad mode, a company like RR should not be settling for that.
User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by JLv3.0 »

Amen to that. It's wrong. It's WROOOOOOOONG!!
User avatar
JonMad
Posts: 2700
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:25 pm
Currently Driving: 2015 Swift; 2012 Yeti; 2006 Fabia

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by JonMad »

That wheel arch gap is odd, especially being shown alongside the quote from the guy saying the architecture allows him to put the roof and wheels one exactly the right place.

I quite like it otherwise, as a luxurious way to travel, apart from in black. Though is it worth double (I'm guessing) a top of the range Range Rover which itself doesn't exactly lack a feeling of luxury?
Left over crest; tightens.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9433
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by Jobbo »

ImageI don’t think the wheel arch gap looks bad in its usual mode. God knows why they released photos jacked up like that, but any car with air suspension looks odd jacked up. Even a Discocunt.
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 6172
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by ZedLeg »

I don't think it looks too bad in this colour.

Image

Better than a Bentayga or an Urus anyway.

I wouldn't have one over a Range Rover but 600 lb-ft of torque at 1600rpm would be fun in a muddy field :lol:.
An absolute unit
User avatar
Holley
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:21 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by Holley »

It's a bit meh. It's just too conventional with a nice but tried and tested interior.

For £250k I want the body to be in carbon, no B pillar (so totally open like the Aston concept), 800hp electric drivetrain with a 400 mile range and a proper wow interior.

This just seems like it's out of date. Meh
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 6172
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by ZedLeg »

Holley wrote: Fri May 11, 2018 11:10 am For £250k I want the body to be in carbon, no B pillar (so totally open like the Aston concept), 800hp electric drivetrain with a 400 mile range and a proper wow interior.
And jet packs, and rocket launchers and it should be a submarine ;).
An absolute unit
User avatar
Holley
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:21 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by Holley »

ZedLeg wrote: Fri May 11, 2018 11:17 am
Holley wrote: Fri May 11, 2018 11:10 am For £250k I want the body to be in carbon, no B pillar (so totally open like the Aston concept), 800hp electric drivetrain with a 400 mile range and a proper wow interior.
And jet packs, and rocket launchers and it should be a submarine ;).
Now that's just silly. How would the jet packs work when under water!
User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by JLv3.0 »

Exactly. Keep it realistic FFS.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9969
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by Mito Man »

Actually I agree with no B pillar and it wouldn’t be hard to implement as BMW already have the tech to do it. That picture with the doors open just looks wrong as the entry space into the rear door seems way too tight for something like a Rolls Royce.

Also don’t see how it can possibly go anywhere a Range Rover can if it has the usual crap X drive system and no locking diffs.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Jezh
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:35 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by Jezh »

IanF wrote: Thu May 10, 2018 6:04 pm
Alex_ wrote: Thu May 10, 2018 5:56 pm I've seen a few Bentaygas now and they look decent. Part of me wants one.
Wife would love a Bentayga. I like them, but there are plenty of other things on the list before I’d spend that much on an SUV!

The Rolls is very disappointing, but I guess UK taste is a very small consideration compared to how it goes down in Asia and the Middle East.
Christ, just imagine how much damage that would do to the front of your house when she inevitably reverses into it :lol:
Your opinion is very important for me. Thank you please.
IanF
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e
Contact:

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by IanF »

Goodwood just put a video up; it looks much more impressive in video. I’m guessing the design has to hide plenty of things and be capable of being armoured.
Cheers,

Ian
User avatar
GG.
Posts: 4679
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by GG. »

IanF wrote: Fri May 11, 2018 11:59 am I’m guessing the design has to be capable of being armoured.
Are we talking about the RR Canyonero still or is this in reference to your rebuilt porch? ;)
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11909
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: RR Cullinan

Post by mik »

I havent watch it, but I am confident this review will provide everything you need to know. :ugeek:

Post Reply