It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

User avatar
John
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by John »

Wow. That could have been very nasty :o
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 5781
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by jamcg »




I guess this is why so many people ride in London
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 4316
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

Cycling is so convenient in central, and the real massive win is when I need to visit multiple places in town, on a bike it's so quick to whizz between locations. When I was doing triathlon I also used to run too, it's about 8 miles from Soho to my place, so I'd get the train in which would take about 45 mins, then run home, which would take just over an hour as a zone 2 run. Great use of time.
User avatar
Ascender
Posts: 4428
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:07 pm
Location: Proper Up North
Currently Driving: Polaris ATV, Hilux, Navara, Dakar, M3 Touring

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Ascender »

Gavster wrote: Tue Dec 02, 2025 7:41 am Cycling is so convenient in central, and the real massive win is when I need to visit multiple places in town, on a bike it's so quick to whizz between locations. When I was doing triathlon I also used to run too, it's about 8 miles from Soho to my place, so I'd get the train in which would take about 45 mins, then run home, which would take just over an hour as a zone 2 run. Great use of time.
Working in Edinburgh is the same, you'd be mad not to bike if you're fit. Even coming in from the outlying towns 7-10 miles away, the bike would be the quickest thing door to door.

When I start working out by the airport for a client, I'd run to a train station, get the train across town and then run from station to office at the other end. I'd have to get up a wee bit earlier than if I'd driven, but it meant I got the training done during the day and wasn't stuck in traffic for an hour each way.
Cheers,

Mike.
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 5781
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by jamcg »

User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 11092
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

:lol:
User avatar
mik
Posts: 15635
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

Have we already had this (cvnt)?

User avatar
Simon
Posts: 5738
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Simon »

Geez, what a cunt. And lacky cunts in the comments backing him up. Cunts. Cunts everywhere.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 13051
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

I haven't got the sound turned on but which one is the cnut there? The cyclist is going through a red light so it's irrelevant that the pedestrian steps out to stop him.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 15635
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

Jobbo wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 10:28 am I haven't got the sound turned on but which one is the cnut there? The cyclist is going through a red light so it's irrelevant that the pedestrian steps out to stop him.
The cyclist. You need the sound on to hear him remonstrate that the pedestrian should have applied some common sense, yes he saw the light, and fuck off. Fuck off. Fuck off.
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by MikeHunt »

By this logic, 60mpg doesnt apply on a quite road...never thought Id say this but can we hear more from the cyclist :D
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 13051
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

Now I've listened to it as well as seen it, :rofl:

Entitled cnut.
User avatar
Ascender
Posts: 4428
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:07 pm
Location: Proper Up North
Currently Driving: Polaris ATV, Hilux, Navara, Dakar, M3 Touring

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Ascender »

mik wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 10:32 am
Jobbo wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 10:28 am I haven't got the sound turned on but which one is the cnut there? The cyclist is going through a red light so it's irrelevant that the pedestrian steps out to stop him.
The cyclist. You need the sound on to hear him remonstrate that the pedestrian should have applied some common sense, yes he saw the light, and fuck off. Fuck off. Fuck off.
I've seen that guy's videos pop up before - he's based in Edinburgh and seems to post numerous videos of himself riding like an entitled cvnt for shits and giggles.

So yes, he passes the cvnt test.
Cheers,

Mike.
Post Reply