DeskJockey wrote: Thu Apr 16, 2026 2:09 pm
I guess it depends on what you perceive the value to be.
I'm not particularly bothered about the movement as long as it keeps time and works as expected. I get that on a skeleton style watch the movement is part of the artwork, but for this one other factors drive the cost. Perhaps it can (unfairly in my view) fall into the style over substance category?
As a general rule, not just with watches, I'm always wary when people over-explain and describe features to try and make things sound more impressive than they really are
And there are some red-flags in the description of this watch
All hands applied with non-radioactive alkaline rare earth metal phosphorescent “lume” (silicate-aluminate oxide, doped with europium ions).
So, luminous coating on the hands, like pretty much every tool watch in the whole world
SSI/TMI calibre NH35A 12 ligne Japanese automatic self-winding mechanical movement. Specifically chosen by us after extensive testing, for its robustness, reliability, and accuracy
Lots of words for a £20 mass-produced Seiko movement that can be found in £50 watches
Fully machined in-house from 6082-T6 aluminium alloy (for silver dials),
I'm wearing a T6/Grade 5 Watch Dives watch at the moment - it cost less than £100
Oh, and this £825+ doesn't even have a sapphire crystal - it's an acrylic one - just noticed this
IMO this 100% form/cost over function/value - of course it's a personal thing in terms of design, but the materials, movement etc is in no way special or worth the price that's being charged...