Which M3?
Re: Which M3?
E92, E46, G80 in that order.
- Explosive Newt
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm
Re: Which M3?
When I first started reading car mags in my late teens, the E46 was the new kid on the block, and I lapped up the gushing reviews (there's an image for you). As a result, it fixed in my mind as the definitive. I must admit the stance still looks spot on to me.
There is one in silvery gold that always parks in a corner space of the multistorey at work so it is good to know some folk still use them as a daily.

There is one in silvery gold that always parks in a corner space of the multistorey at work so it is good to know some folk still use them as a daily.

- integrale_evo
- Posts: 5695
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm
Re: Which M3?
I know no one else will choose it, but the e36 is still my favourite. ( I am not including the csl as that’s a different beast )
It was still the one which gave the biggest generational jump in performance, the 3.2 fixed much of the initial criticism of the platform.
For me it’s the last properly analogue one, the engine feels raw and racey and sounds superb.
After an e30 they definitely feel more GT than sportscar, but in hindsight as M3s became ever more competent and the foibles smoothed over, it still feels nimble and alive, but will bite if you take liberties. No traction or stability control on any of them, no sports mode or settings you have to fiddle with. A decent amount of travel on the cable throttle and abs is all the help you get. It’s also properly narrow compared to later cars, which helps a lot on tighter roads.
I’m not sure I’d ever recommend one to someone, for the money a decent one costs you could also buy either an e46 or e90, which would probably better suit far more people. If you want an e36 you probably already know you do. Back when an e36 was £4K and an e46 was 15k they were a performance bargain!
The e30 will always have the honour of being the first, and if you want the M to stand for motorsport, then it’s the only one designed specifically to go racing. I think it’s a bit unfair to say they’re no good because they’re expensive these days. Obviously it makes a difference if you’re looking to buy, but people asking lots of money doesn’t take away from the driving experience. And to only look at the numbers is entirely missing the point. They just have that light footed flowing balance that was lost when weight started piling on and wheels went ever wider.
I’d still love an e46, and an e90. I just wouldn’t swap an e36 for one, they’d have to be in addition.
It was still the one which gave the biggest generational jump in performance, the 3.2 fixed much of the initial criticism of the platform.
For me it’s the last properly analogue one, the engine feels raw and racey and sounds superb.
After an e30 they definitely feel more GT than sportscar, but in hindsight as M3s became ever more competent and the foibles smoothed over, it still feels nimble and alive, but will bite if you take liberties. No traction or stability control on any of them, no sports mode or settings you have to fiddle with. A decent amount of travel on the cable throttle and abs is all the help you get. It’s also properly narrow compared to later cars, which helps a lot on tighter roads.
I’m not sure I’d ever recommend one to someone, for the money a decent one costs you could also buy either an e46 or e90, which would probably better suit far more people. If you want an e36 you probably already know you do. Back when an e36 was £4K and an e46 was 15k they were a performance bargain!
The e30 will always have the honour of being the first, and if you want the M to stand for motorsport, then it’s the only one designed specifically to go racing. I think it’s a bit unfair to say they’re no good because they’re expensive these days. Obviously it makes a difference if you’re looking to buy, but people asking lots of money doesn’t take away from the driving experience. And to only look at the numbers is entirely missing the point. They just have that light footed flowing balance that was lost when weight started piling on and wheels went ever wider.
I’d still love an e46, and an e90. I just wouldn’t swap an e36 for one, they’d have to be in addition.
Cheers, Harry
- Rich B
- Posts: 12018
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
- Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise
Re: Which M3?
Speaking of electronics and stability gubbins, the system on the e46 was a complete waste of time - i turned it off every time i started the car. The system on the e92 was excellent though - it allowed silly sideways play whilst still keeping you from dying in a ditch.
Re: Which M3?
You could leave big fuckoff darkies on the floor as you leave the petrol station in m-dynamic mode 
Re: Which M3?
Carlos wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 7:58 pm You could leave big fuckoff darkies on the floor as you leave the petrol station in m-dynamic mode![]()
- Rich B
- Posts: 12018
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
- Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise
Re: Which M3?
yep, the MdM mode was fantastic, way better than any of the modes on the M2.Carlos wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 7:58 pm You could leave big fuckoff darkies on the floor as you leave the petrol station in m-dynamic mode![]()
another reason why the e92 was the best M3.
Re: Which M3?
To use as a road car, I think you might be right, as long as it's the 3.2.integrale_evo wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 7:29 pm I know no one else will choose it, but the e36 is still my favourite. ( I am not including the csl as that’s a different beast )
It was still the one which gave the biggest generational jump in performance, the 3.2 fixed much of the initial criticism of the platform.
For me it’s the last properly analogue one, the engine feels raw and racey and sounds superb.
After an e30 they definitely feel more GT than sportscar, but in hindsight as M3s became ever more competent and the foibles smoothed over, it still feels nimble and alive, but will bite if you take liberties. No traction or stability control on any of them, no sports mode or settings you have to fiddle with. A decent amount of travel on the cable throttle and abs is all the help you get. It’s also properly narrow compared to later cars, which helps a lot on tighter roads.
I’m not sure I’d ever recommend one to someone, for the money a decent one costs you could also buy either an e46 or e90, which would probably better suit far more people. If you want an e36 you probably already know you do. Back when an e36 was £4K and an e46 was 15k they were a performance bargain!
The e30 will always have the honour of being the first, and if you want the M to stand for motorsport, then it’s the only one designed specifically to go racing. I think it’s a bit unfair to say they’re no good because they’re expensive these days. Obviously it makes a difference if you’re looking to buy, but people asking lots of money doesn’t take away from the driving experience. And to only look at the numbers is entirely missing the point. They just have that light footed flowing balance that was lost when weight started piling on and wheels went ever wider.
I’d still love an e46, and an e90. I just wouldn’t swap an e36 for one, they’d have to be in addition.
Not that it's on the list, but I also preferred the Z4M to the E46 (which is why I bought one), as the less competent suspension made it feel more alive at sensible speeds.
Re: Which M3?
Given the choice I'd have a dark blue or purple 328 sport if it was an E36.
No logical reason why but I think it was the pick of the range whenever I've seen a nice one.
As a Touring, a low E36 M3 touring also looks better than any other home brew touring version.
Dave!
No logical reason why but I think it was the pick of the range whenever I've seen a nice one.
As a Touring, a low E36 M3 touring also looks better than any other home brew touring version.
Dave!
Re: Which M3?
Never really lusted after an M3 (always preferred the C32 / C63 option) but if you put a gun to my head, an E46 CSL would be the only one I'd like