It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
No bikes but still an opportunity for a disagreement
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Lambellghini, but that didn't make the white walloper jut its schnozz out; doppelwankeren.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
GTA6 looks lit.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Bloody cyclists.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
- Gavster
- Posts: 3621
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
- Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
This is absolutely incredible. Although the last two bikes absolutely rode themselves into that and likely jumped the red light, I think there is a case to be made that the van turned right without checking his mirrors so should actually take most of the liability. Just because the mopeds were riding like twats on an Uber eats team time trial doesn't mean they actually caused it.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Overtaking a van that is clearly indicating right is van’s fault??
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
True enough I suppose
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
100% moped idiots fault, also overtaking on zigzags.
- Rich B
- Posts: 11137
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
- Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
to be fair, they’d weaved from the other side to overtake the camera car, he could have looked in his mirror and they weren’t there when he started indicating.
either way, i put zero blame on the van.
either way, i put zero blame on the van.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
What Rich said.
Bikes went for overtakes on zigzags, of a van signalling right, after weaving from nearside to offside, and 2 of them went through a red light to do it.
Bikes went for overtakes on zigzags, of a van signalling right, after weaving from nearside to offside, and 2 of them went through a red light to do it.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
-
- Posts: 3242
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
- Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e - Contact:
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Just because the bikes were overtaking illegally on the zig zags doesn't excuse the van driver completely. I'd say that's 50/50 up to 80/20 more favouring the van, though I feel sorry for the driver.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
I blame the cyclist.
The third one went over in support of its two brothers - the three mehscooteers.
The third one went over in support of its two brothers - the three mehscooteers.
Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Top marks Nuttinnew - very good… 

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement
Brilliant, making yourself more in the way because you fancy a slow chat makes you a bit of a knob.
The road section of the Rutland Water loop sees most cross country guys overtake the Lycra lot as that’s where they like a chat. Normally we used to pedal like we are being chased by a Vegan with a leaflet and then knock up a couple of gears to look composed and fly past them saying morning
Dave!
The road section of the Rutland Water loop sees most cross country guys overtake the Lycra lot as that’s where they like a chat. Normally we used to pedal like we are being chased by a Vegan with a leaflet and then knock up a couple of gears to look composed and fly past them saying morning
Dave!