It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 889
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by MikeHunt »

nuttinnew wrote: Tue Nov 26, 2024 1:45 pm
I hope he played the lottery that night.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10353
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

He certainly did better than the chap in the clip after...
Jobbo wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:28 pm Having been for a rotation in the Yangwang, the Yangwang didn't wobble around afterwards and was actually quite comfortable to ride in.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10353
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

Jobbo wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:28 pm Having been for a rotation in the Yangwang, the Yangwang didn't wobble around afterwards and was actually quite comfortable to ride in.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10353
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

They click through ok :roll:


Jobbo wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:28 pm Having been for a rotation in the Yangwang, the Yangwang didn't wobble around afterwards and was actually quite comfortable to ride in.
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 7453
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Beany »

the first one you can click through to, the second one absolutely you can't because it's tagged as violent (it's a scooter rider getting knocked off and falling down a storm drain) - you'll need to quote, copy the link and paste to a new tab to see it.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10353
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

Post check fail :oops:
Jobbo wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:28 pm Having been for a rotation in the Yangwang, the Yangwang didn't wobble around afterwards and was actually quite comfortable to ride in.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10353
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

Jobbo wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:28 pm Having been for a rotation in the Yangwang, the Yangwang didn't wobble around afterwards and was actually quite comfortable to ride in.
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 4652
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by jamcg »

Local compensation company (Atha and co if you’re interested) have started advertising on the radio directly for getting compensation for cyclists “was a poorly designed cycle lane to blame” etc

Given some of the scummers that ride on the wrong side of the road doing wheelies in my area I bet there’s a few going to be throwing themselves infront of cars soon
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6234
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by dinny_g »

The "blame, claim, compensation" industry is going to come back to haunt us all eventually.
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
mik
Posts: 13642
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

Yep. And pedestrians jumping in front of cyclists will be next.

1. Far lower risk than stepping out in front of a car.
2. Easy to use the “doesn’t matter what I did - I am higher risk so you must take care of me” approach that cyclists have pushed successfully
3. Don’t even need to steal a bike to participate.
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 7862
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by ZedLeg »

The risk may be lower but if I hit someone on my bike it’s gonna fuck them up.

Also I’m not insured so where the claim going? Sue me personally?
An absolute unit
User avatar
mik
Posts: 13642
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

ZedLeg wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 6:19 pm
Also I’m not insured so where the claim going? Sue me personally?
Where there’s blame there’s a claim. Pedestrians are more vulnerable - cyclists must ensure their safety.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10353
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

Interesting concept if you're not legally obliged to use a cycle lane. Probably banging fook out of the "not fit for use/purpose" drum (drummers, lmk what riddim you'd do it in).
Jobbo wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:28 pm Having been for a rotation in the Yangwang, the Yangwang didn't wobble around afterwards and was actually quite comfortable to ride in.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10353
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

Jobbo wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2025 1:28 pm Having been for a rotation in the Yangwang, the Yangwang didn't wobble around afterwards and was actually quite comfortable to ride in.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 13642
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

100% driver fault. Cyclist enters the roundabout almost a full second before the van reaches their give way line - I assume they were looking to their right only (?)
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 4652
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by jamcg »

That’s another one where a little bit of self preservation would have helped.

Legally the van driver is culpable and is indeed a cunt. Regardless of wether the cyclist should have waited or not vans not looking at the road ahead and has hit a bloke in a bike

However these videos just make me wish cyclists would learn that it’s better to do something you shouldn’t have to and be safe. Yes it’s not what should happen, and many people will say this is victim blaming but it’s not intended as such. It’s just wishing cyclists would change mindset from “I’m the vulnerable road user, I have right of way” to “everyone is trying to kill me”

Is much rather see a video of “if I hadn’t waited that cunt of a bus driver would have killed me there” than “watch a bus driver not give way to me and snap my spine in 26 places”
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 11240
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

With a mini roundabout you have to give way to vehicles approaching it, not just those on it. So not 100% the van’s fault though it didn’t look like he slowed down at all.
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11042
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Rich B »

yeah, some self preservation would have helped. if he’d looked to his right he would have definitely seen the van coming and easily been able to stop. The van was driving WAY too fast onto the roundabout though.
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 7862
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by ZedLeg »

mik wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 7:28 pm
ZedLeg wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 6:19 pm
Also I’m not insured so where the claim going? Sue me personally?
Where there’s blame there’s a claim. Pedestrians are more vulnerable - cyclists must ensure their safety.
People can sue me personally if they want, I have fuck all :lol:

FWIW I've never deliberately hit a pedestrian.
An absolute unit
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 4652
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by jamcg »

The red car literally came out of nowhere, he didn’t stand a chance

Post Reply