It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9344
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

I'm not sure estimating the distance from that image is reliable, Mik - the camera clearly distorts for a wider field of view. Handlebars on a flat bar bike tend to be 780mm wide now, so 40cm from the edge of the lane looks unlikely anyway. Whatever, the Highway Code now says you should give 1.5m clearance when passing cyclists and that was nowhere near 1.5m as the car draws level.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11780
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

We have successfully achieved disagreement. Another 5 points each.
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9632
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Rich B »

Jobbo wrote: Fri Jan 26, 2024 1:20 pmHandlebars on a flat bar bike tend to be 780mm wide now
The bike in the video has drop bars, which will more likely be 4-500mm wide..
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 8875
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

Jobbo wrote: Fri Jan 26, 2024 1:20 pm I'm not sure estimating the distance from that image is reliable
There's no issue then, what's all the fuss?*




*For balance, they're all cvnts.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11780
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 8875
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

Post some of the replies up please :)
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9344
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

Mik, I notice you are posting replies to these blatant trolling videos.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11780
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

I couldn’t help it
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 8875
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

User avatar
mik
Posts: 11780
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

Cyclists were lucky to avoid the idiot.
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 3874
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by jamcg »

mik wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 7:49 am Cyclists were lucky to avoid the idiot.
This. Wouldn’t have ended well for either party
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5323
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by dinny_g »

I believe Pedestrians have priority now so the correct response is:

Bloody hooligan cyclists - they should have slowed before the park exit and expected a pedestrian to appear. No consideration for other road users... :roll:
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Carlos
Posts: 2183
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Carlos »

Not blaming the cyclists in any way but as a vulnerable road user i wouldnt be going for the ninja stealth look :lol:
Last edited by Carlos on Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: ya mum

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

Regents Park on a weekend morning is full of cyclists dripping head to toe in Rapha gear on all-black £10k bikes. I take great pleasure in overtaking them on my £150 Ribble Audax with panniers 😂
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4743
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Swervin_Mervin »



:lol:
User avatar
Ascender
Posts: 3563
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:07 pm
Currently Driving: 2019 M2 Competition

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Ascender »

Carlos wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 1:29 pm Not blaming the cyclists in any way but as a vulnerable road user i wouldnt be going for the ninja stealth look :lol:
This is one of my pet peeves. They get very indignant about it too if you ask why. I've had arguments about it where they have no interest or even sense of responsibility about making themselves be easier to spot as they see it all being on other road users (car drivers) to see them regardless of lighting conditions, time of day, background etc.
Cheers,

Mike.
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5323
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by dinny_g »

Carlos wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 1:29 pm Not blaming the cyclists in any way but as a vulnerable road user i wouldnt be going for the ninja stealth look :lol:
It's 100% the cyclists fault...

If car drivers are now expected to drive ultra defensively, to anticipate what cyclists might do and where they may appear and think "cyclist" all the time and in the event of an accident, it's almost always the drivers fault.

Then the same applies to cyclists and pedestrians.

"those in charge of vehicles that can cause the greatest harm in the event of a collision bear the greatest responsibility to take care and reduce the danger they pose to others"

Those two cyclists did NOT take care and take steps to reduce the danger they posed.

100% their fault :D
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: ya mum

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

My turn 🙋‍♂️ lol. Really need to start wearing a GoPro for this entertainment.

Cycled into the city and back for a meeting. Well, a haircut. Everyone is a zombie today. Countless cars cut me up from both directions, turning across the cyclepath into a sideroad without noticing me. I was weraing high viz too. Pedestrians around Fenchurch street, as always, were stepping off the pavement without looking etc.

The first incident, just half a mile from home was a dude who overtook just after this junction. I always take a defensive position here and ride around 1 metre from the kerb as the potholes you can see in this (2 year old) image are now 6" to 9" deep.

Image

After the crossing I immediately pull back in to be nearer to the kerb, however the dude behind me had already taken offense and proceeded to overtake so close that I was able to knock on his passenger side window without deviating from my course. Then he pulled up in front of me for a chat. He then got out of his car and continued shouting accusations and threats at me as a small group of crackheads gathered watching :lol: Here's a short clip. I never bother arguing but he actively wanted to shout at me so I let him.

User avatar
mik
Posts: 11780
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

He appears to think you need a tape measure in order to tell the difference between 150cm and 15cm.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9884
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Mito Man »

Fucking Uber drivers 😂
How about not having a sig at all?
Post Reply