DeskJockey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:51 pmSee, you're meeting me halfway!
New TV Tiime
Re: New TV Tiime
Re: New TV Tiime
A house we stayed in recently had a nice Samsung TV on the wall
However, it seemed to upscale everything in a way that made films (especially) look awful
It seemed to be a combination of a much higher frame rate (which made films look like broadcast TV), and a kind of "seclective high definition" where certain people/parts of the screen would appear hyper-real, but the effect was undone by movement of that thing/person in the frame
Watching Maverick was a surreal experience because this (as an example)
Anyone know what this might have been down to, and if it's a feature, are these things switch-off-able?
However, it seemed to upscale everything in a way that made films (especially) look awful
It seemed to be a combination of a much higher frame rate (which made films look like broadcast TV), and a kind of "seclective high definition" where certain people/parts of the screen would appear hyper-real, but the effect was undone by movement of that thing/person in the frame
Watching Maverick was a surreal experience because this (as an example)
Anyone know what this might have been down to, and if it's a feature, are these things switch-off-able?
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4785
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: New TV Tiime
I wouldn't even bother if it was a Samsung tbh. The UI is utterly awful.
Re: New TV Tiime
We don't actually use anything on our TVs (Freeview box, Blu-ray and Chromecast) so the TV UI isn't really a concern...Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:45 pm I wouldn't even bother if it was a Samsung tbh. The UI is utterly awful.
It's basically just a screen and speakers
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4785
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: New TV Tiime
Fair enough. However, any aspect of the UI is awful, particularly if you need to switch between sources.DaveE wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 4:59 pmWe don't actually use anything on our TVs (Freeview box, Blu-ray and Chromecast) so the TV UI isn't really a concern...Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:45 pm I wouldn't even bother if it was a Samsung tbh. The UI is utterly awful.
It's basically just a screen and speakers
Re: New TV Tiime
Cool, that's good to know, thanksSwervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:04 pmFair enough. However, any aspect of the UI is awful, particularly if you need to switch between sources.DaveE wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 4:59 pmWe don't actually use anything on our TVs (Freeview box, Blu-ray and Chromecast) so the TV UI isn't really a concern...Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:45 pm I wouldn't even bother if it was a Samsung tbh. The UI is utterly awful.
It's basically just a screen and speakers
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4785
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: New TV Tiime
No worries. We have one as do my parents and they drive me nuts I use ours as a monitor and switching between sources is a painDaveE wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 9:34 pmCool, that's good to know, thanksSwervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:04 pmFair enough. However, any aspect of the UI is awful, particularly if you need to switch between sources.
Re: New TV Tiime
My samsung tv has been one of the most frustrating tech purchases I've ever made tbh.
It's one hand the best TV I've ever had and on the other completely infuriating. Some of the decisions they made around UI and connectivity are baffling.
It's one hand the best TV I've ever had and on the other completely infuriating. Some of the decisions they made around UI and connectivity are baffling.
An absolute unit
Re: New TV Tiime
LG have the best UI and tend not to kill functionality with updates. I hardly ever use the Apple TV or Firestick connected to our LG (but always use them on the Samsung).
Sony is fine until you need to find a setting that is hidden in an illogical location.
Samsung is pretty painful.
Panasonic is somewhere between Sony and Samsung - it works well for some users, but poorly for others.
As someone that supplies/installs over 100 TVs a year, it's LG every time for me these days unless a particular size/aesthetic is not available.
Sony is fine until you need to find a setting that is hidden in an illogical location.
Samsung is pretty painful.
Panasonic is somewhere between Sony and Samsung - it works well for some users, but poorly for others.
As someone that supplies/installs over 100 TVs a year, it's LG every time for me these days unless a particular size/aesthetic is not available.
Re: New TV Tiime
Yeah, I'll probably go back to LG when I buy a new one. My old one was faultless for 10 years, never even dropped a pixel.
Would still have it if I hadn't wanted to upgrade for 4K and Dolby Atmos.
Would still have it if I hadn't wanted to upgrade for 4K and Dolby Atmos.
An absolute unit
Re: New TV Tiime
I have gone against forum convention and ordered a Philips 55OLED808 TV for the hall without seeking validation. I saw one in Richersounds and it looked great. Seems to get good reviews too.
Also ordered a NAIM-MU-SO-G2 for the sounds and to plug a turntable into so the wife can play her LP's
Also ordered a NAIM-MU-SO-G2 for the sounds and to plug a turntable into so the wife can play her LP's
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4803
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: New TV Tiime
Yes. This place has a special in my heart I'm indecisive enough with these sorts of purchases to then have numerous different options on the table.
Demo'd, liked, ordered, done
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4803
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: New TV Tiime
But, if you like us, why did you deprive us of the opportunity to suggest some more or less relevent options, or a diesel Golf?
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: New TV Tiime
Re: New TV Tiime
I had a friend who's 4K Sony TV did this - they liked it btw - I have no idea what setting was on it but it was a weird sort of uncanny valley for picture quality which made everything look like live TV from the US.DaveE wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:07 pm A house we stayed in recently had a nice Samsung TV on the wall
However, it seemed to upscale everything in a way that made films (especially) look awful
It seemed to be a combination of a much higher frame rate (which made films look like broadcast TV), and a kind of "seclective high definition" where certain people/parts of the screen would appear hyper-real, but the effect was undone by movement of that thing/person in the frame
Watching Maverick was a surreal experience because this (as an example)
Anyone know what this might have been down to, and if it's a feature, are these things switch-off-able?
Cheers,
Mike.
Mike.
Re: New TV Tiime
In my defence I only went in to look at a cheap turntable for the wife. Didn't think I wanted or needed anything else but it turned out that I did Some form of Evonomics I'm sureRich B wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:34 pmDemo'd? You're not supposed to test stuff, you're supposed to order blindly!!!!
Re: New TV Tiime
I’m lucky that I listened to some high end Naim hifi kit nearly 20 years ago thinking I might buy it and really hated the sound. So I’d never get a Muso even though it’s probably much less Naim-signature sonically now.