It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12181
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

The hand signals were utterly incorrect and the rest of the advice was trite and unhelpful, presumably being the reason for deletion.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14696
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

Back to the earlier clip - decent analysis here.

User avatar
Simon
Posts: 5508
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Simon »

Great analysis. As has been said, they're both a pair of twats, but 'cycling Twitter' will look to absolve Jeremy of any responsibility for his stupid actions.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 995
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by MikeHunt »

I know a guy who loved his motorbikes R1s and Ducatis, who is now an ex-biker for that very reason.
IanF
Posts: 3573
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e
Contact:

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by IanF »

Cheers,

Ian
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 5508
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Simon »

Was Vine on holiday?
The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14696
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

2 separate incidents over the weekend where the car in front (on an A-Road) got bored sitting behind a cyclist after 5 seconds and just pulled out - despite being on blind bends. :?

First one was uneventful. Second one still had both offside wheels over the centreline (whilst returning to their lane) when they very nearly collected a van head-on coming the other way.

Gives me the heebies about cycling on the road - so many drivers are shit. :?
User avatar
Ascender
Posts: 4327
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:07 pm
Location: Proper Up North
Currently Driving: Polaris ATV, Hilux, Navara, Dakar, M3 Touring

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Ascender »

I've found that as a solo cyclist, most drivers give you "enough" room that you're if you're used to cycling regularly, it's no concern. It's not as much as you'd like, but it is what it is. What's a bit disconcerting and very common is when you get overtaken and you can see how late they've left it to pull out and rather than passing you at a parallel, they're still going out at an angle to start the move as they pass.

I still find it strange that if there's literally nothing coming on a long straight, how many drivers still pass relatively closely when they could just move over in to the other lane as if overtaking a car. Especially on a fast stretch of road.
Cheers,

Mike.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5531
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Ascender wrote: Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:43 am I've found that as a solo cyclist, most drivers give you "enough" room that you're if you're used to cycling regularly, it's no concern. It's not as much as you'd like, but it is what it is. What's a bit disconcerting and very common is when you get overtaken and you can see how late they've left it to pull out and rather than passing you at a parallel, they're still going out at an angle to start the move as they pass.

I still find it strange that if there's literally nothing coming on a long straight, how many drivers still pass relatively closely when they could just move over in to the other lane as if overtaking a car. Especially on a fast stretch of road.
I'lln ever understand those people that also don't feel they've yet got enough room to overtae because of oncoming traffic, but are moving along with the front half of their vehicle fully alongside the cyclist. At that point either get the f on with it, surely, or sit back and wait properly.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10760
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

Sweary so you might want to mute it;

tim
Posts: 1868
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

50/50 idiocy there. Next.

no wait, I watched it again and realised that's not a 3 lane road. Idiot motorcyclists fault.
Last edited by tim on Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
You settle up, I'll go get the Jag.
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6628
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by dinny_g »

Line markings are a bit odd no ??

Seems to indicate that cars in the left lane can turn right ??
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10760
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

dinny_g wrote: Tue Sep 26, 2023 4:53 pm Line markings are a bit odd no ??

Seems to indicate that cars in the left lane can turn right ??
What other lane would they be in?
(If you watched without sound, try it with).
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10760
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

tim wrote: Tue Sep 26, 2023 4:35 pm 50/50 idiocy there. Next.
MSMM rather than MSM?
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6628
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by dinny_g »

nuttinnew wrote: Tue Sep 26, 2023 5:22 pm
dinny_g wrote: Tue Sep 26, 2023 4:53 pm Line markings are a bit odd no ??

Seems to indicate that cars in the left lane can turn right ??
What other lane would they be in?
(If you watched without sound, try it with).
Yeah you’re right. I initially thought it was 2 lanes in the direction they’re travelling and one in the opposite direction
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3878
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Gavster »

Swervin_Mervin wrote: Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:26 am
Ascender wrote: Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:43 am I've found that as a solo cyclist, most drivers give you "enough" room that you're if you're used to cycling regularly, it's no concern. It's not as much as you'd like, but it is what it is. What's a bit disconcerting and very common is when you get overtaken and you can see how late they've left it to pull out and rather than passing you at a parallel, they're still going out at an angle to start the move as they pass.

I still find it strange that if there's literally nothing coming on a long straight, how many drivers still pass relatively closely when they could just move over in to the other lane as if overtaking a car. Especially on a fast stretch of road.
I'lln ever understand those people that also don't feel they've yet got enough room to overtae because of oncoming traffic, but are moving along with the front half of their vehicle fully alongside the cyclist. At that point either get the f on with it, surely, or sit back and wait properly.
My personal rule is that if someone passes close enough for me to knock on their window without changing my course then I will. Happens pretty regularly tbh, luckily in London they're usually only travelling a couple of mph faster than me.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14696
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

That's quite close. :shock:

edit: would appear to be the B7076 that pre-dates the A74M (and runs alongside it for much of its length).

> Not the most generous (or clearly lined-off) cycle lane
> Dodgy overtake - driver stays in their designated lane, but barely completes the pass, having to cut in front of the truck (and should have spotted the cyclist before pulling out)
> Dozey wobbly cyclist paying 98% attention waving for the camera, 1.99% attention on cycling, 0.01% attention to the risks around her.

Last edited by mik on Wed Sep 27, 2023 4:09 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11541
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Rich B »

Wtf is she doing weaving all over the road - she's about 2m from the kerb!

Daft of the car to overtake with her there though.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5531
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Both dickheads was my assessment when watching it. I'm all for calling out dangerous driving, but ffs this cannot go without some significant self-relfection from cyclists on what they're doing and whether they are riding safely.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12181
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

I really can't blame the cyclist in any way there - we didn't see why she was a way from the kerb but she was perfectly entitled to ride in the middle of the lane if she wanted. Good job she didn't; a very close shave.
Post Reply