They've bought into the idea of a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Apparently addresses are old hat.unzippy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 20, 2018 2:16 amWhat issues does the business have that pitcher thinks this will address?DeskJockey wrote: ↑Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:26 am Just seen that someone has pitched to the business that we should use this for our global addresses. It may be adopted
What.Three.Words
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4680
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: What.Three.Words
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: What.Three.Words
The Evo forum really is a shadow of its former self. I remember when the internet was for the elite and now they seem to let any spastic on
IaFG Down Under Division
IaFG Down Under Division
Re: What.Three.Words
w.t.f
where.am.i
you.are.here
where.am.i
you.are.here
Re: What.Three.Words
From mik's Boris post;
Re: What.Three.Words
I haven't seen any ads for What Three Words recently - I guess they've run low on the start-up capital. And I think people are finding it doesn't work very well, as anyone sensible said in the first place. How long will they carry on, do you reckon?
Re: What.Three.Words
I see it used quite regularly, especially at events and in large open spaces, at festivals etc. where phone signal can be dodgy. The 5k race at the weekend also supplied what.three.words references in their race pack. Apparently very popular with emergency services too.
Re: What.Three.Words
We use it at scouts when sending out location information to parents. Zero ambiguity as many places don’t work well with satnav and it’s possible to go to the wrong place as there can sometimes be different places with the same name.
Eg. We sometimes camp at a scout site called Thornthwaite near Harrogate. If you Google Thornthwaite campsite the first result is in Keswick
Eg. We sometimes camp at a scout site called Thornthwaite near Harrogate. If you Google Thornthwaite campsite the first result is in Keswick
Re: What.Three.Words
Ambiguities aren’t as much of a problem as actual errors. You don’t have any context to work out the right location if it’s slightly wrong.
I think the infamous balls up using it for the queue to see the Queen lying in state might have been the beginning of the end for it: https://gizmodo.com/queen-elizabeth-ii- ... 1849536290
I think the infamous balls up using it for the queue to see the Queen lying in state might have been the beginning of the end for it: https://gizmodo.com/queen-elizabeth-ii- ... 1849536290
Re: What.Three.Words
Scout camps, 5k park runs and mountain rescue... I'd have thought they'd need more customers than that to grow as a business!
Re: What.Three.Words
You’d think, wouldn’t you
- IanF
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
- Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e - Contact:
Re: What.Three.Words
I've had DPD and Evri deliveries to my wtw location, plus I know modern cars can use it in their satnav, well before that was replaced by apple CarPlay etc., but I think the scale is just too small. If you look at a typical house, the number of boxes is massive. Maybe 10mx10m would've worked sufficiently well?
Cheers,
Ian
Ian
Re: What.Three.Words
It's about locating the front door exactly, not just the address though.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: What.Three.Words
Agreed, it would probably see more use as an optional layer in google maps rather than it’s own app, but that would mean selling the company as a whole to google and closing up shop
Re: What.Three.Words
There's already a way to pinpoint a location to more accuracy in Google Maps (co-ordinates); why would they pay for this?
Re: What.Three.Words
Aside from the undertone of schadenfreude in this thread, have I missed something about them struggling or going under? They've been going for 10 years, and have a core global audience that probably far exceeds 100m people, which is more than most businesses. Seems like a perfectly viable opportunity unless there's some news about them which I haven't seen.
Re: What.Three.Words
yep, 50 million children would be a great audience for a private YouTuber/TikTok person… sadly WTW is a business with investors including Intel Capital, Mercedes-Benz, Sony Innovation Fund, Subaru, Aramex, Deutsche Bahn, Ingka Investments, ITV AdVentures Invest and Channel 4 Ventures who will all want some return on their investment!
Re: What.Three.Words
Just lack of publicity except negative stories which appear from time to time. I was always against their model of making location info a proprietary dataset which can't be decoded without a licence from them and a smartphone or computer. Ultimately it would be potentially useful if open source, though no more useful than knowing how to read a map or simply using any other mapping app on your phone.Gavster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 8:30 am Aside from the undertone of schadenfreude in this thread, have I missed something about them struggling or going under? They've been going for 10 years, and have a core global audience that probably far exceeds 100m people, which is more than most businesses. Seems like a perfectly viable opportunity unless there's some news about them which I haven't seen.
Re: What.Three.Words
well their accounts on companies house show a £16m loss on 2020 and a £43 million loss in 2021…Gavster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 8:30 am Aside from the undertone of schadenfreude in this thread, have I missed something about them struggling or going under? They've been going for 10 years, and have a core global audience that probably far exceeds 100m people, which is more than most businesses. Seems like a perfectly viable opportunity unless there's some news about them which I haven't seen.
Re: What.Three.Words
This is from January: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/wha ... tatistics/
I know it's cool to be unprofitable as a tech start-up, but their revenue was only £458,000 in 2020 and their annual losses (having never made a profit) increased to £16.1m.
I know it's cool to be unprofitable as a tech start-up, but their revenue was only £458,000 in 2020 and their annual losses (having never made a profit) increased to £16.1m.