Today’s want

User avatar
Zonda_
Posts: 2726
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:35 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Zonda_ »

I remember MarkBT_52 taking me round Donington in his Exige, bonkers. Only thing I've passengered in that was quicker was a 340R!
User avatar
JonMad
Posts: 2695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:25 pm
Currently Driving: 2015 Swift; 2012 Yeti; 2006 Fabia

Re: Today’s want

Post by JonMad »

Carlos wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 3:24 pm
JonMad wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 3:12 pm Yeah I know they’re rare and all but £280k vs about £5k I expect, for a CLK55. :shock:
Are they the same underpinnings ?
Well, the DTM is supercharged, so 200+bhp more, and can do 200mph and 60 in < 4s. So there is that.

Same basic engine as some others though, albeit retuned: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes- ... Kompressor
Left over crest; tightens.
User avatar
Coaster1
Posts: 1819
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2018 10:38 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Coaster1 »

User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9620
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: Today’s want

Post by Rich B »

pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?
User avatar
Alex_
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:55 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Alex_ »

The picture reminds me those Alfa circular alloys are some of the most beautiful designs ever.
M235i
User avatar
JonMad
Posts: 2695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:25 pm
Currently Driving: 2015 Swift; 2012 Yeti; 2006 Fabia

Re: Today’s want

Post by JonMad »

It does look lovely. And so small. A 2+2 as well.
Left over crest; tightens.
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by NotoriousREV »

I’m trying to buy this but the seller isn’t responding.
F00E4DA7-F4AC-4B02-9D89-AE7D1E2AD0CF.jpeg
F00E4DA7-F4AC-4B02-9D89-AE7D1E2AD0CF.jpeg (77.06 KiB) Viewed 7644 times
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
GG.
Posts: 4649
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by GG. »

NotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:50 am I’m trying to buy this but the seller isn’t responding.

F00E4DA7-F4AC-4B02-9D89-AE7D1E2AD0CF.jpeg
He probably only communicates over CB radio ;)

User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 4493
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by integrale_evo »

Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 am
pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?
Because it was designed in the 70s
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
Carlos
Posts: 2176
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: Today’s want

Post by Carlos »

integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 am
Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 am
pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?
Because it was designed in the 70s
A 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?

Those GTV go really well and are a right handful drive. The oddest driving position i have ever come across, i couldnt get remotely comfortable.

ETA- The advert is wrong as they were 230bhp.
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9620
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: Today’s want

Post by Rich B »

Carlos wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:40 am
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 am
Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 am pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?
Because it was designed in the 70s
A 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?

Those GTV go really well and are a right handful drive. The oddest driving position i have ever come across, i couldnt get remotely comfortable.

ETA- The advert is wrong as they were 230bhp.
was the 3.2 around 230bhp? Equally pathetic for something supposed to be a special version.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9866
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Mito Man »

It was on purpose so you could be on the loud pedal for longer and listen to that glorious V6 ;)
Not like new cars nowadays where after 3 seconds of throttle you’re banned from driving.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by NotoriousREV »

Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:43 pm
Carlos wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:40 am
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 am

Because it was designed in the 70s
A 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?

Those GTV go really well and are a right handful drive. The oddest driving position i have ever come across, i couldnt get remotely comfortable.

ETA- The advert is wrong as they were 230bhp.
was the 3.2 around 230bhp? Equally pathetic for something supposed to be a special version.
The 24v 3.0 was 220ps (vs 230 for the BMW 3.0 of that era) and the 3.2 was 240ps. 75ps/litre is just normal, really. It was hardly an M3 competitor (nor was it M3 money).
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 4493
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by integrale_evo »

A mid 80s 2.5 version of a 70s BMW straight 6 made 170bhp odd, a 2001 BMW 2.2 straight 6 made 170bhp ish.

My mid 90s 3.2 straight 6 BMW made 316bhp...
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 4493
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by integrale_evo »

156gta wasn't far off m3 money was it?

I love how they look and probably would have bought one years ago if they had another 70bhp and were rwd.
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by NotoriousREV »

integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:14 pm My mid 90s 3.2 straight 6 BMW made 316bhp...
So you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9620
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: Today’s want

Post by Rich B »

NotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:55 pm
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:14 pm My mid 90s 3.2 straight 6 BMW made 316bhp...
So you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.
nah, just they they’re a “bit shit.”
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by NotoriousREV »

Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 2:04 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:55 pm
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:14 pm My mid 90s 3.2 straight 6 BMW made 316bhp...
So you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.
nah, just they they’re a “bit shit.”
I think you’ll find they’re “pathetic”.
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by NotoriousREV »

Anyway, the Firebird I want makes 34bhp/litre. Beat that for pathetic output :lol:
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9866
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Mito Man »

I have farts more powerful.
How about not having a sig at all?
Post Reply