a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post Reply
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 718
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by MikeHunt »

Mazda punches above its weight here, ‘A Caterham with CarPlay’ :lol:

https://www.pistonheads.com/features/ph ... -220/45797

Ive been tempted by an alpine previously but the conventional roof, turbo and auto box in my mind don't really belong in a a lightweight car and I always felt that alfa had done it slightly better. Good to see another Super 220, even its its the wrong colour.
User avatar
McSwede
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:04 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by McSwede »

MikeHunt wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:09 am Mazda punches above its weight here, ‘A Caterham with CarPlay’ :lol:

https://www.pistonheads.com/features/ph ... -220/45797

Ive been tempted by an alpine previously but the conventional roof, turbo and auto box in my mind don't really belong in a a lightweight car and I always felt that alfa had done it slightly better. Good to see another Super 220, even its its the wrong colour.
That MX5 had a huge amount of appeal to me (being a Mk1 owner) but the Alpine just doesn't do anything for me.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11759
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by mik »

There’s a LOT I really like about the Alpine, and 300bhp makes it way more interesting than the 250bhp of earlier/standard cars.

4-pot and auto-box remain significant detractors for me.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9327
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by Jobbo »

I love the Alpine though would want the base spec for the proper experience.

But I'd definitely buy a 184bhp MX5 ND over it. Really it's just as bespoke a thing, but it's made in such greater numbers that it's half the price. No brainer.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4738
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

I love the Alpine. And as per Simon - I'd want virtually the original spec. I will have one, it's just a matter of when really - I knew that much as soon as I sat in one at TLBS Live. It just felt so right.
User avatar
JonMad
Posts: 2695
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:25 pm
Currently Driving: 2015 Swift; 2012 Yeti; 2006 Fabia

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by JonMad »

I test drove an Alpine and it felt very nice indeed. But then the GR86 came along (though they'll be going for high £30ks for the foreseeable) with n/a and a manual gearbox. Can they put those upgrades on the hard top MX-5 RF?
Left over crest; tightens.
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 718
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by MikeHunt »

JonMad wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 11:51 am Can they put those upgrades on the hard top MX-5 RF?
Yes, its virtually the same car.
speedingfine
Posts: 2179
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:05 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by speedingfine »

Caterham with Carplay my arse. Just get an R400 and stop faffing with these other so called sports cars ;)
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9870
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by Mito Man »

I like the Alpine overall, nice little package just wish the arse end wasn’t so ugly.
The MX5 is probably a bit too slow for me for a sports car but at £30k and £60k I’ll pass on both :lol:
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11759
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by mik »

Mito Man wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:44 pm I like the Alpine overall
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314027566058
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 718
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by MikeHunt »

Mito Man wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:44 pm The MX5 is probably a bit too slow for me for a sports car but at £30k and £60k I’ll pass on both :lol:
I understand why your saying that as it has under 200bhp and zero torque, but I owned a standard 184 bhp mx5 at the same time as a Golf R and never felt it was slow. The super 220 actually has a better power to weight that the R.

The late 2019 cars are down below £20k now, not a bad price for a modern sports car with a decent level of tech and creature comforts.
User avatar
Pete_
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:35 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by Pete_ »

mik wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:24 pm
Mito Man wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:44 pm I like the Alpine overall
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314027566058
:lol:

I would also love to one day own an Alpine.

Not sure if it's a London thing, but I've see very few ND MX5s over the last couple of years - though haven't really seen many older ones here either. In Belfast it seemed like MX5s were everywhere.
User avatar
John
Posts: 1184
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by John »

I haven't found myself wanting more power, it pretty much hits the sweet spot in what you can utilise on public roads.
User avatar
Carlos
Posts: 2177
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by Carlos »

Do you have Ste's dad's BBR MX-5 ?

It looked great fun but can't remember anyone posting about it after buying it !
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 718
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by MikeHunt »

John wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:56 am I haven't found myself wanting more power, it pretty much hits the sweet spot in what you can utilise on public roads.
How are you finding the suspension travel, I felt it was a bit too soft and floaty on low/medium speed corners, hence the springs and roll bars.
User avatar
John
Posts: 1184
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by John »

Carlos wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:04 am Do you have Ste's dad's BBR MX-5 ?

It looked great fun but can't remember anyone posting about it after buying it !
Sold now, the performance was fun but it never seemed to run as sweetly as a standard one. Recently bought an ND RF 184.
User avatar
John
Posts: 1184
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by John »

MikeHunt wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 11:34 am
How are you finding the suspension travel, I felt it was a bit too soft and floaty on low/medium speed corners, hence the springs and roll bars.
It’s certainly floaty and you get a strange sensation when going up through the gears if cornering slightly. I’m considering the Mazda lowering springs which are an option on new cars. Don’t get me wrong though, it’s still a great handling car as standard.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4738
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: a110 vs bbrgti mx5

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Sat in the Skoda garage atm waiting for the Superb to be serviced and this is on the forecourt

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details ... obcid=soc3

I'm not a fan of the colour or the black wheels. It's like a muddy salmon pink in the sun. 🤢
Post Reply