Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post Reply
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 4489
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by integrale_evo »

Then the new facelift Hyundai Kona could be for you

Image

Image

:lol: :lol:
Last edited by integrale_evo on Fri Nov 20, 2020 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11726
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Every wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by mik »

Harry. Is that Engrish? I am not sure that is allowed now.
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9601
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Rich B »

Image
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 6329
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Beany »

IIRC the Konas were a pain to get a hold of - very long wait times and all that.

I suppose making them look utterly fucking idiotic is one way to reduce demand.
User avatar
Barry
Posts: 1618
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:59 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Barry »

Beany wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:30 pm IIRC the Konas were a pain to get a hold of - very long wait times and all that.

I suppose making them look utterly fucking idiotic is one way to reduce demand.
Waiting list on BEV models is about 12mnths I believe. That's high demand for a car that's been setting themselves on fire.

https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/electric- ... -fire-risk
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 6329
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Beany »

Oooof. That has to be a BMS or related ancillaries (cooling, conditioning, etc) issue, I mean, it's not like LG Chem are new to making the raw cells :lol:
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Mito Man »

It probably looks better after it’s been on fire.
How about not having a sig at all?
V8Granite
Posts: 3947
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:57 am

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by V8Granite »

Didn’t they famously run more efficiently than every other electric car though ?

Dave!
mr_jon
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu May 24, 2018 11:07 am

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by mr_jon »

They do seem to get good mileage. Probably less have immolated than say, Tesla's, though. The waiting list is a problem.
User avatar
240PP
Posts: 1430
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:27 am
Currently Driving: A5 3.0 TDI, 987 S.

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by 240PP »

I don't think it looks too bad.. I'll get my coat
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 3847
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by jamcg »

I don’t think it looks terrible, but I dont get having multiple light blocks on the back of a car, just do one and be done with it- possibly have remote reverse and fogs but nothing more
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Mito Man »

Was it the Freelander 1 which had 2 sets of rear lights but the brake lights and indicators were the bottom row where you usually expect the fogs and reverse? I hated that design!
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 4489
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by integrale_evo »

Loads of 4x4 type things are like that.

I remember the old vitaras, the uk ones had the lights in the bumper with the fog light in a blank behind the arch, but in Europe they were the other way round with the lights on the sides and the fogs in the square bits on the bumper which looked miles better.

But at least they didn’t look like the top and bottom halves were designed by two completely different teams who had never met and didn’t realise they were creating a single vehicle.
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
Barry
Posts: 1618
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:59 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Barry »

mr_jon wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:06 pm They do seem to get good mileage. Probably less have immolated than say, Tesla's, though. The waiting list is a problem.
Indeed, it's a small number in the scheme of things and doesn't stop it being the obvious choice when my Ioniq lease is up in a year or so. I'm regularly seeing 4.5m/kWh without even trying, they're efficient these Hyundai.
User avatar
Ascender
Posts: 3551
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:07 pm
Currently Driving: 2019 M2 Competition

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Ascender »

240PP wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:17 pm I don't think it looks too bad.. I'll get my coat
I concur.

Definitely better than the new 1 series although that's not saying much.
Cheers,

Mike.
mr_jon
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu May 24, 2018 11:07 am

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by mr_jon »

Barry wrote: Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:37 am
mr_jon wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:06 pm They do seem to get good mileage. Probably less have immolated than say, Tesla's, though. The waiting list is a problem.
Indeed, it's a small number in the scheme of things and doesn't stop it being the obvious choice when my Ioniq lease is up in a year or so. I'm regularly seeing 4.5m/kWh without even trying, they're efficient these Hyundai.
We're down below 4 in the Leaf, now winter is kicking in. The usage is mixed reasonably quick a-roads, so not the best for efficiency.
User avatar
Barry
Posts: 1618
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:59 pm

Re: Ever wanted a car sat on top of a car?

Post by Barry »

mr_jon wrote: Sat Nov 21, 2020 10:01 am
Barry wrote: Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:37 am
mr_jon wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:06 pm They do seem to get good mileage. Probably less have immolated than say, Tesla's, though. The waiting list is a problem.
Indeed, it's a small number in the scheme of things and doesn't stop it being the obvious choice when my Ioniq lease is up in a year or so. I'm regularly seeing 4.5m/kWh without even trying, they're efficient these Hyundai.
We're down below 4 in the Leaf, now winter is kicking in. The usage is mixed reasonably quick a-roads, so not the best for efficiency.
Last two runs were 3.5 on mine too, mostly local and no real attempt to be frugal with it. Wet roads and cold do them no favours do they.
Post Reply