Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post Reply
User avatar
scotta
Posts: 3031
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:28 pm

Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by scotta »

Whats the minimum height seperation needed between flights?

I was on a flight from LCY to EDI last night. Looking out the window another flight came from the east and passed directly overhead FAST! Flightradar shows less than 1000ft seperation. That normal?

User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by NotoriousREV »

Can’t see the numbers on the vid. What was the height difference?
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
scotta
Posts: 3031
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by scotta »

NotoriousREV wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:57 am Can’t see the numbers on the vid. What was the height difference?
975 feet

go right to the start of the video it shows the height then i click on the second plane and scroll to the height.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11721
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by mik »

Vid plays fuzzy at the start for me.

Supposed to be minimum 1000ft separation AFAIK. I use FlightRadar, but not sure how accurate it is.... would probably need proper ATC data to assess, but 975ft sounds about right.
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by Simon »

I think 1000 feet is the minimum, but if one plane is above the 'standard' pressure switchover (sorry, I forget the name) and one below it then that could allow for a small discrepancy.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by NotoriousREV »

scotta wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:03 am
NotoriousREV wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:57 am Can’t see the numbers on the vid. What was the height difference?
975 feet

go right to the start of the video it shows the height then i click on the second plane and scroll to the height.
I get what you’re doing but the numbers aren’t viewable on a mobile phone even full screen ;)
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11721
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by mik »

More importantly, did you get the pilot to do a 1000rpm to vMax in 3rd?
User avatar
scotta
Posts: 3031
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by scotta »

NotoriousREV wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:19 am
scotta wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:03 am
NotoriousREV wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:57 am Can’t see the numbers on the vid. What was the height difference?
975 feet

go right to the start of the video it shows the height then i click on the second plane and scroll to the height.
I get what you’re doing but the numbers aren’t viewable on a mobile phone even full screen ;)
Sent you a higher res one by special message!
User avatar
Matty
Posts: 2157
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:50 pm
Currently Driving: Up! GTi, Alfa 4C

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by Matty »

mik wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:21 am More importantly, did you get the pilot to do a 1000rpm to vMax in 3rd?
Reminds me of a story on the SR-71 :D
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/ ... heck-72136
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 6328
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by Beany »

If we get a reply, and then the news channels start reporting a plane crash, I blame you guys.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11721
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by mik »

Dont come on here with your bad altitude Beany.
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 6328
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by Beany »

mik wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:59 am Dont come on here with your bad altitude Beany.
Ah, stick it up yer flaps.
User avatar
scotta
Posts: 3031
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by scotta »

Beany wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:41 pm
mik wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:59 am Dont come on here with your bad altitude Beany.
Ah, stick it up yer flaps.
As long as we dont see your black box...
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 8833
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by nuttinnew »

Maybe so close because a flight was delayed. Was your ride on time?
tim
Posts: 1653
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by tim »

I am not IanF nor do I play him on TV, but I do know that Reduced Vertical Separation Minima is 1000ft with suitably equipped aircraft.
User avatar
Orange Cola
Posts: 2232
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:56 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by Orange Cola »

1000ft between commercial aircraft sounds... close to me.
Mustang GT 5.0 V8 -- Jaguar F-Pace
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11721
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by mik »

Would you propose a Cure?
User avatar
Orange Cola
Posts: 2232
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:56 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by Orange Cola »

Certainly wouldn’t be the Clash.
Mustang GT 5.0 V8 -- Jaguar F-Pace
User avatar
IanF
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e
Contact:

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by IanF »

Few things affecting the separation- firstly for a more comfortable ride, the aircraft have a soft hold of their altitude and so fly +/- 50ft from their assigned level. Secondly the three separate air data sources on those aircraft have an acceptable variation of +/- 200ft at high altitudes. (Typically the difference is around 20-30ft). The transponder relates to a particular source on the flight deck which is not necessarily the same one as the autopilot is receiving its altitude info from. Finally, an aircraft hasn’t deviated from it’s assigned level until they are over 200ft away.

The aircraft have a system call tcas that monitors closure rates and prevents them getting too close and ATC have a predictive tool that highlights issues to them aswell.

Tl;dr.- 975ft is fine
Cheers,

Ian
User avatar
scotta
Posts: 3031
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: Altitude separation FAO - IanF

Post by scotta »

IanF wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:47 pm Few things affecting the separation- firstly for a more comfortable ride, the aircraft have a soft hold of their altitude and so fly +/- 50ft from their assigned level. Secondly the three separate air data sources on those aircraft have an acceptable variation of +/- 200ft at high altitudes. (Typically the difference is around 20-30ft). The transponder relates to a particular source on the flight deck which is not necessarily the same one as the autopilot is receiving its altitude info from. Finally, an aircraft hasn’t deviated from it’s assigned level until they are over 200ft away.

The aircraft have a system call tcas that monitors closure rates and prevents them getting too close and ATC have a predictive tool that highlights issues to them aswell.

Tl;dr.- 975ft is fine
[mention]IanF[/mention] Ta :)
Post Reply