Boom. Nail and head.duncs500 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:57 pm I would love cheaper trains and better public services for less money. Unfortunately, to get this the organisation in question needs to be motivated by generating efficiency and delivering good customer service. As it is public sector organisations just aren't.
Bye Bye Boris!
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4709
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4709
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
It is, but it would never happen. See Local Authority budget cuts. Rather than cut the inflated middle tiers those authorities chose to make it political and protect their own by cutting frontline services and pointing the finger of blame at Westminster.DeskJockey wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:58 pmBut change is possible.duncs500 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:57 pm I would love cheaper trains and better public services for less money. Unfortunately, to get this the organisation in question needs to be motivated by generating efficiency and delivering good customer service. As it is public sector organisations just aren't.
UK public sector is grossly inefficient and protectionist. They don't want to change
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Those strike me as tubthumping to appease the crusty hippy 'smash the toffs' part of the membership. Which is, incidentally, why they'll never get elected in any strength.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:38 pmReappropriating private schools? That were never in public ownership? Or how about land deemed too big for one ownership?DeskJockey wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:30 amIf they can sell it, they can buy it back. Not suggesting it will be simple or easy, though.speedingfine wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:27 am
I'm pretty left of centre and agree with Swerv here. How do you propose it works lefty folks? Genuine question.
Most people, as has been stated elsewhere, are a little to the left or a little to the right. But Labour spend far, far too much time deepthroating their own hardcore membership. And frankly, there aren't enough of them to win an election, and they're alienating their core voters (such as me) with this utter, infantile, 'marxism for dummies' bollocks.
I'm not afraid of Corbyn being elected, because it won't happen.
I'm far more afraid that we'll go through another four years of bullshit with the Tories and a mixed opposition who can't agree on anything and nothing will get fucking done.
Also, having spent many a year in local govt, what Merv said is fucking spot on about protectionism and inefficiency. It's not in their interest to rock the boat, so they don't.
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4637
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
I'm fine with the latter, frankly.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:38 pmReappropriating private schools? That were never in public ownership? Or how about land deemed too big for one ownership?DeskJockey wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:30 amIf they can sell it, they can buy it back. Not suggesting it will be simple or easy, though.speedingfine wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:27 am
I'm pretty left of centre and agree with Swerv here. How do you propose it works lefty folks? Genuine question.
As for the schools, if they were never in public ownership then they shouldn't be. However, should a private school be publicly funded? I don't know the answer, asking the question.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
I’m not suggesting that this is in any way behind a potential Labour policy to re-nationalise public utilities etc but I can’t shake the feeling that it amounts to increasing the national debt and creating a very large group of voters who will feel any vote other than a Labour vote jeopardises their Job with the proceeds...
- IanF
- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
- Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e - Contact:
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Well, I agree with Beany (med levels checked in the morning ). The biggest issue, I think, is the need for a viable opposition. Irrespective of whatever government we end up with after the next GE, we need someone that doesn’t just say “no” because it came from the other team, but rather through facts and passion ( I know, do I even follow UK politics! )Beany wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 8:07 pmThose strike me as tubthumping to appease the crusty hippy 'smash the toffs' part of the membership. Which is, incidentally, why they'll never get elected in any strength.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:38 pmReappropriating private schools? That were never in public ownership? Or how about land deemed too big for one ownership?DeskJockey wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:30 am
If they can sell it, they can buy it back. Not suggesting it will be simple or easy, though.
Most people, as has been stated elsewhere, are a little to the left or a little to the right. But Labour spend far, far too much time deepthroating their own hardcore membership. And frankly, there aren't enough of them to win an election, and they're alienating their core voters (such as me) with this utter, infantile, 'marxism for dummies' bollocks.
I'm not afraid of Corbyn being elected, because it won't happen.
I'm far more afraid that we'll go through another four years of bullshit with the Tories and a mixed opposition who can't agree on anything and nothing will get fucking done.
Also, having spent many a year in local govt, what Merv said is fucking spot on about protectionism and inefficiency. It's not in their interest to rock the boat, so they don't.
Cheers,
Ian
Ian
- NotoriousREV
- Posts: 6437
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Don't feed the troll, Rev.
Interesting reading, the Withdrawal Agreement Bill. I like the fact that it brings back into force parts of the European Communities Act 1972 which were previously repealed by the 2018 Withdrawal Act.
Interesting reading, the Withdrawal Agreement Bill. I like the fact that it brings back into force parts of the European Communities Act 1972 which were previously repealed by the 2018 Withdrawal Act.
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Oh, Broccers - how's Lloyds doing today? What's your explanation for the drop?
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Brexit in a week or so.
Presumable we’re just letting the ink dry?
Presumable we’re just letting the ink dry?
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
The thing is that the tories promised to bring down the national debt and after ten years of punitive austerity measures categorically haven't, they are in fact still overspending. I don't think it stands up to say that the tories are the party of economic common sense anymore.dinny_g wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 10:30 pm I’m not suggesting that this is in any way behind a potential Labour policy to re-nationalise public utilities etc but I can’t shake the feeling that it amounts to increasing the national debt and creating a very large group of voters who will feel any vote other than a Labour vote jeopardises their Job with the proceeds...
An absolute unit
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Doesn't that just make you wonder where we would be if they had shunned austerity and continued to spend spend spend?ZedLeg wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2019 10:41 amThe thing is that the tories promised to bring down the national debt and after ten years of punitive austerity measures categorically haven't, they are in fact still overspending. I don't think it stands up to say that the tories are the party of economic common sense anymore.dinny_g wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 10:30 pm I’m not suggesting that this is in any way behind a potential Labour policy to re-nationalise public utilities etc but I can’t shake the feeling that it amounts to increasing the national debt and creating a very large group of voters who will feel any vote other than a Labour vote jeopardises their Job with the proceeds...
I still don't know where this magical money comes from to spend more. I know if I was constantly in my overdraft and paying interest, the answer would not be to increase my spending.
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
That's not really true, regarding debt/deficit.ZedLeg wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2019 10:41 amThe thing is that the tories promised to bring down the national debt and after ten years of punitive austerity measures categorically haven't, they are in fact still overspending. I don't think it stands up to say that the tories are the party of economic common sense anymore.dinny_g wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 10:30 pm I’m not suggesting that this is in any way behind a potential Labour policy to re-nationalise public utilities etc but I can’t shake the feeling that it amounts to increasing the national debt and creating a very large group of voters who will feel any vote other than a Labour vote jeopardises their Job with the proceeds...
Deficit - the rate at which debt increases, to massively oversimplify it - has dropped a lot, and national debt has flatlined and dropped slightly the last few years as opposed to rising.
(ONS data, don't tell me it's biased, the civil service hate austerity as much as anyone else, less money to go around innit....)
That said, it seems to be barely touching the sides in terms of actual debt.
I don't disagree that austerity has been deeply problematic in it's implementation though. I mean, just look at Universal Credit, where you take the most vulnerable in society - those without work for any reason - and you are literally trying to not support them at every turn.
It begs the question of 'is it worth it' in terms of overall societal impact.
And whether just some marginal tax rises would actually be a better option. You know, like extracting more than the paltry amount we have from the likes of FB, Google, Starbucks, etc.
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Plus the BoE has injected 1tn in QE since the financial crash and rates have been slammed to near zero for much of that time. Very unclear that any Keynsian economic stimulus would have made the situation better. Likelihood is just that it would have made us look more fiscally irresponsible and lead to higher borrowing costs on Gilts.duncs500 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:04 amDoesn't that just make you wonder where we would be if they had shunned austerity and continued to spend spend spend?ZedLeg wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2019 10:41 amThe thing is that the tories promised to bring down the national debt and after ten years of punitive austerity measures categorically haven't, they are in fact still overspending. I don't think it stands up to say that the tories are the party of economic common sense anymore.dinny_g wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 10:30 pm I’m not suggesting that this is in any way behind a potential Labour policy to re-nationalise public utilities etc but I can’t shake the feeling that it amounts to increasing the national debt and creating a very large group of voters who will feel any vote other than a Labour vote jeopardises their Job with the proceeds...
I still don't know where this magical money comes from to spend more. I know if I was constantly in my overdraft and paying interest, the answer would not be to increase my spending.
Given the lunacy of the fiscal programme from the Corbynites the gap in credibility on economic governance between the parties is arguably the biggest it has been at any time since the 1980s.
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
The 1% drop first thing this morning. Bounced back about half that. Is this as people read the Withdrawal Agreement Bill and then gradually work out that it means we won't be leaving on 31st?
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Seems the scrutiny of the Withdrawal Agreement Bill is indeed raising issues. The permanence of the NI customs border being one, even once an FTA has been put in place (if it can be put in place by the end of next year, which itself is ridiculously ambitious).
But the MPs supporting Leave don't seem to want it to be scrutinised; they just want to vote for it unquestioningly. So I have a solution; a BRINO agreement (the EU would almost certainly agree to this) which Boris sells as 'Getting Brexit Done' with a few fudged statements if anyone asks questions. We could leave, keeping Remain supporters mostly happy and pacifying Leavers.
Instead we have the objectionable NI backstop (which, remember, may never have been invoked) turned into the permanent arrangement for NI. This isn't even a hard Brexit, it's a ridiculous scenario which shouldn't even appeal to Leavers.
But the MPs supporting Leave don't seem to want it to be scrutinised; they just want to vote for it unquestioningly. So I have a solution; a BRINO agreement (the EU would almost certainly agree to this) which Boris sells as 'Getting Brexit Done' with a few fudged statements if anyone asks questions. We could leave, keeping Remain supporters mostly happy and pacifying Leavers.
Instead we have the objectionable NI backstop (which, remember, may never have been invoked) turned into the permanent arrangement for NI. This isn't even a hard Brexit, it's a ridiculous scenario which shouldn't even appeal to Leavers.
- NotoriousREV
- Posts: 6437
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Any deal is shit by its nature, No Deal is catastrophic economically and politically. There’s only one option that makes any sense.
Middle-aged Dirtbag