McLaren's 2020 Results

Post Reply
SSO
Posts: 704
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 1:13 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by SSO »

Just posted my analysis of McLaren's 2020 results and a few perspectives on their future:

https://karenable.com/mclarens-2020-results/

Thoughts? Will they make it?
RobYob
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by RobYob »

Interesting to see how the financial sausage is made.

They certainly seen to have a healthier position and better plan for the future than some manufacturers.

Quality is an interesting one, I don't know myself if it's all about technical robustness of design or a culture of continuous improvement or some other mantra. McLaren seem to want to lean toward the first as they do have an work culture of thoroughly burning people out after a few years resulting in a lot of engineering staff churn.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9327
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by Jobbo »

The two figures which are telling to me are the two which aren’t in the estimate range. They sold more cars at retail than they estimated but EBITDA was worse than the worst estimate.
V8Granite
Posts: 3959
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:57 am

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by V8Granite »

I probably see 20 Mclarens to every Ferrari I see, they seem far more attainable or just have much nicer finance packages or deals.

Dave!
SSO
Posts: 704
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 1:13 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by SSO »

Jobbo wrote: Mon May 03, 2021 7:56 am The two figures which are telling to me are the two which aren’t in the estimate range. They sold more cars at retail than they estimated but EBITDA was worse than the worst estimate.
The EBITDA miss was more likely due to a shortfall in the F1 prize money they were expecting.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9327
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by Jobbo »

That would be reflected in the group revenue figure, which was bang in the middle of the estimate, wouldn’t it?
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11753
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by mik »

More likely they thought they had some variable cost they could flex down.... only to realise it wasn’t that flexible?
User avatar
Sundayjumper
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:04 pm
Currently Driving: Peugeot 406

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by Sundayjumper »

Wrong mix of cars ? Lots of low margin cars and not enough specials ?
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9327
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by Jobbo »

Sundayjumper wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 8:35 am Wrong mix of cars ? Lots of low margin cars and not enough specials ?
That sounds like the reason, yet McLaren's own statement (from SSO's article) said:
The good news is McLaren broadly delivered against the Q3 expectations. They did this through a very rich product mix. Over 60% of the cars sold in Q4 were high margin Speedtails, Sabres, Elvas, and 765LTs. McLaren delivered an estimated 78 Ultimate Series cars in Q4 2020 with 120-130 still to come in 2021.

I know they're not a public company so the reporting requirements are far less onerous but this just sounds inconsistent.
SSO
Posts: 704
Joined: Tue May 29, 2018 1:13 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: McLaren's 2020 Results

Post by SSO »

Sundayjumper wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 8:35 am Wrong mix of cars ? Lots of low margin cars and not enough specials ?
The miss was GBP 4 mil. To put it in perspective, if delivery on two Speedtails and a Sabre moved from end Dec to beginning of Jan, that would result in the miss.
Post Reply