No F1 thread?

User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Mito Man »

integrale_evo wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 11:50 am You can’t, there’s a limit to what existing battery tech can do, there are already manufacturers throwing billions at electric and were barely seeing any increases. Most of the increases come from improving efficiencies elsewhere, aero, tyres, weight saving, regen.

Unless there’s a significant jump in technology on the horizon then to double the range you have to more than double the battery capacity with the ridiculous weight penalty that would bring.
There has been a pretty significant jump in battery tech but price is the limiting factor for road cars. I’m sure a battery pack which costs a few hundred grand currently is no issue for a racing car though. I believe these expensive lithium batteries offer twice the energy for the same weight.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Mito Man »

Also some quick simple maths to get some numbers. Current fuel density is 9.7 kWh per litre of petrol. Let’s round up to 10kwh as F1 fuel is fancy stuff. 105kg fuel limit * 10 = 1050kwh but an F1 engine is only 50% efficient isn’t it so a 525kwh battery bolted into an F1 car would be sufficient if it were the same weight as the current hybrid unit which it isn’t. But introduce recharging halfway through the race and a 262.5 kWh would be entirely sufficient.
Which suddenly looks plausible. Tbh you may need less anyway due to the regen, more efficient gearbox but depends how much it would weigh.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Wilspeed
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:54 am

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Wilspeed »

Comparing Formula E to Formula 1 is like comparing Holiday on Ice to Olympic figure skating.

Both cool in their own way but not the same sport.
Cunt.
RobYob
Posts: 2484
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by RobYob »

Might be a good time to get away from aero obsessed regulations too.

I couldn't give AF about ultimate laptimes anyway. Unlimited specials like the 919 Evo have made a mockery of them anyway.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Mito Man »

The unregulated 919 Evo which got whooped by a regulated F1 car? 😂
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 4489
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by integrale_evo »

Mito Man wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 12:07 pm Also some quick simple maths to get some numbers. Current fuel density is 9.7 kWh per litre of petrol. Let’s round up to 10kwh as F1 fuel is fancy stuff. 105kg fuel limit * 10 = 1050kwh but an F1 engine is only 50% efficient isn’t it so a 525kwh battery bolted into an F1 car would be sufficient if it were the same weight as the current hybrid unit which it isn’t. But introduce recharging halfway through the race and a 262.5 kWh would be entirely sufficient.
Which suddenly looks plausible. Tbh you may need less anyway due to the regen, more efficient gearbox but depends how much it would weigh.
Recharging halfway through a race? Yeah, mandatory hour pit stop to stretch their legs and have a cup of tea while they recharge 😂
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Simon »

:D Because no-one 'seriously drives for a couple of hours without a break'.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Mito Man »

integrale_evo wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 12:29 pm
Mito Man wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 12:07 pm Also some quick simple maths to get some numbers. Current fuel density is 9.7 kWh per litre of petrol. Let’s round up to 10kwh as F1 fuel is fancy stuff. 105kg fuel limit * 10 = 1050kwh but an F1 engine is only 50% efficient isn’t it so a 525kwh battery bolted into an F1 car would be sufficient if it were the same weight as the current hybrid unit which it isn’t. But introduce recharging halfway through the race and a 262.5 kWh would be entirely sufficient.
Which suddenly looks plausible. Tbh you may need less anyway due to the regen, more efficient gearbox but depends how much it would weigh.
Recharging halfway through a race? Yeah, mandatory hour pit stop to stretch their legs and have a cup of tea while they recharge 😂
It’s 30 seconds. I don’t think that’s so bad is it?
How about not having a sig at all?
RobYob
Posts: 2484
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by RobYob »

Mito Man wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 12:18 pm The unregulated 919 Evo which got whooped by a regulated F1 car? 😂
Equivalent of 2nd in qualifying with double the weight "whooped" indeed. :roll:

Point stands, F1 is regulated to the point where ultimate laptimes are meaningless and I'd rather see better racing than better laptimes.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Mito Man »

Yes whooped. When something which is extremely regulated outperforms something with all the rules removed then that’s a pretty thorough spanking. Just remove fuel flow and electrical limits off an F1 car and it would be another dimension.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Mito Man »

Hulk replacing Stroll who has the shits it seems.
How about not having a sig at all?
RobYob
Posts: 2484
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by RobYob »

Toto Wolff's Nurburgring record attempt. Respect.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4731
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Swervin_Mervin »




:shock:
RobYob
Posts: 2484
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by RobYob »

Danny Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiic! :lol:
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 3846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by jamcg »

Cyrils getting a tattoo 😂 Danny said something about him with a German flavour- I really hope it’s a cartoon of Danny in lederhosen 😂

Lewis getting Michael’s helmet was a nice touch
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 4603
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by duncs500 »

Ham impressive again, I think he surprised Bottas a bit as he suddenly started reeling him in to close to a second and that pressure seems to a forced the mistake. Would have been interesting to see if he could have passed him without the mistake though.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9846
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Mito Man »

Bottas bottles it as usual 😂

Glad he overtook him before the retirement though otherwise he’d be on about how he’d have won the race otherwise.
Well deserved humble pie after thinking he defeated Hamilton last race
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4731
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

I think i missed something - how did DR get ahead of Perez in the last safety car period? It was Perez, DR, Sainz one minute as expected after the stops and next thing before the SC went in DR was ahead?
mr_jon
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu May 24, 2018 11:07 am

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by mr_jon »

Perez stopped on the 2nd SC lap, once they realised he'd be a sitting duck on older tyres. Everyone else had stopped so he had a big gap behind DR to drop into, still under the SC.
User avatar
JonMad
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:25 pm
Currently Driving: 2015 Swift; 2012 Yeti; 2006 Fabia

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by JonMad »

2 new drivers next year for Haas then.
Looking forward to Portimao.
Left over crest; tightens.
Post Reply