Coronavirus
- 16vCento
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:06 pm
- Currently Driving: XFS Portfolio
V60 D3 SE
Xantia Activa
Re: Coronavirus
Hope you're OK [mention]Beany[/mention]
I'm only 20 miles or so away, so if you get stuck for owt let me know
I'm only 20 miles or so away, so if you get stuck for owt let me know
Re: Coronavirus
The thing is though, I can believe that. You're only supposed to get a test if you have symptoms right? How many are getting a test 'just to be sure' or 'because they've been around someone who did test positive' etc?Ascender wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 10:34 pmAnd Matt Hancock on the radio this morning saying the lack of slots and backlogs in tests were due to lots of people going for covid tests when they didn’t really need them...integrale_evo wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:53 pm Yep, drone footage on our local news yesterday of empty testing stations yet people spending hours online refreshing devices to try and book a slot.
Apparently it's not the testing centre capacity that's the issue, it's that there's not enough lab capacity to process the tests in time before the samples expire...
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: Coronavirus
A headteacher at a primary school I know has said about 60% of her teaching staff are booking tests on a daily basis
Re: Coronavirus
Hancock and the Conservatives blaming the public is the easy/lazy excuse. They've had a couple months to scale up and build extra capacity in the system, but instead they've not done enough and cluelessly walked the country into a second wave.Simon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:47 pmThe thing is though, I can believe that. You're only supposed to get a test if you have symptoms right? How many are getting a test 'just to be sure' or 'because they've been around someone who did test positive' etc?Ascender wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 10:34 pmAnd Matt Hancock on the radio this morning saying the lack of slots and backlogs in tests were due to lots of people going for covid tests when they didn’t really need them...integrale_evo wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:53 pm Yep, drone footage on our local news yesterday of empty testing stations yet people spending hours online refreshing devices to try and book a slot.
Apparently it's not the testing centre capacity that's the issue, it's that there's not enough lab capacity to process the tests in time before the samples expire...
Oui, je suis un motard.
Re: Coronavirus
Don't worry about me, kids, my neighbour has me sorted
Was particularly exhausted last night but to be fair, I did dip into the beer. Think I'll leave the rest till I'm not floaty
Feeling a little better this morning but going to chill in bed (seeing as work won't annoy me) and then see how I feel this aft.
As for testing/lab capacity, I was of the understanding that it was the other way around - gobs of lab capacity, but sod all testing capacity.
Was particularly exhausted last night but to be fair, I did dip into the beer. Think I'll leave the rest till I'm not floaty
Feeling a little better this morning but going to chill in bed (seeing as work won't annoy me) and then see how I feel this aft.
As for testing/lab capacity, I was of the understanding that it was the other way around - gobs of lab capacity, but sod all testing capacity.
Re: Coronavirus
Marv is correct. They’ve botched the response to this at every step and are now trying to avoid responsibility.Marv wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:11 amHancock and the Conservatives blaming the public is the easy/lazy excuse. They've had a couple months to scale up and build extra capacity in the system, but instead they've not done enough and cluelessly walked the country into a second wave.Simon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:47 pmThe thing is though, I can believe that. You're only supposed to get a test if you have symptoms right? How many are getting a test 'just to be sure' or 'because they've been around someone who did test positive' etc?
Apparently it's not the testing centre capacity that's the issue, it's that there's not enough lab capacity to process the tests in time before the samples expire...
Same as their current brexit strategy.
An absolute unit
Re: Coronavirus
We’re isolating now until a test comes back for my daughter.
Probably just the usual school bug, but 111 sent an ambulance around this morning. Two hours later and we’re back home, but even a test at St Thomas’s takes up to three days to come back.
Probably just the usual school bug, but 111 sent an ambulance around this morning. Two hours later and we’re back home, but even a test at St Thomas’s takes up to three days to come back.
Re: Coronavirus
Oh don't get me wrong, it's definitely the fault of Dido/Hancock/Boris. But I'm wondering if a bad situation is made worse by people having tests who don't need them.ZedLeg wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:04 amMarv is correct. They’ve botched the response to this at every step and are now trying to avoid responsibility.Marv wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:11 amHancock and the Conservatives blaming the public is the easy/lazy excuse. They've had a couple months to scale up and build extra capacity in the system, but instead they've not done enough and cluelessly walked the country into a second wave.Simon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:47 pm
The thing is though, I can believe that. You're only supposed to get a test if you have symptoms right? How many are getting a test 'just to be sure' or 'because they've been around someone who did test positive' etc?
Apparently it's not the testing centre capacity that's the issue, it's that there's not enough lab capacity to process the tests in time before the samples expire...
Same as their current brexit strategy.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: Coronavirus
So if you were in the situation you couldn't go back to work for two weeks unless you had taken a test, you'd decline because you weren't showing symptoms. You're a better man than me.Simon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:01 amOh don't get me wrong, it's definitely the fault of Dido/Hancock/Boris. But I'm wondering if a bad situation is made worse by people having tests who don't need them.
Re: Coronavirus
If you have symptoms you need a test. If you’ve had known contact I’d also argue you need a test.Rich B wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:15 amSo if you were in the situation you couldn't go back to work for two weeks unless you had taken a test, you'd decline because you weren't showing symptoms. You're a better man than me.
I’m hearing stories of people who have no symptoms and have had no known contact but are still going for one all the time
Re: Coronavirus
We wer told before (around the quarantine when returning from abroad argument) that a negative result doesn't mean you don't have it, simply because of the incubation period. Therefore if, say, someone else in your house has it then you still need to quarantine for 14 days regardless of a negative test.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
- Sundayjumper
- Posts: 6266
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:04 pm
- Currently Driving: Peugeot 406
Re: Coronavirus
I've been trying to keep out of this as I'm somewhat on the inside, but this really caught my eye today. Graph on the BBC website of positive cases per day supporting the OMG WE'RE GOING TO DIE narrative:
The profile of that chart since mid-July matches pretty exactly with my own chart of how many tests have been done over the same period. More tests = more positives, no surprise there, what you really want to know is the prevalence. You could drive the daily positives down to zero if you wanted, you just stop doing any testing
The profile of that chart since mid-July matches pretty exactly with my own chart of how many tests have been done over the same period. More tests = more positives, no surprise there, what you really want to know is the prevalence. You could drive the daily positives down to zero if you wanted, you just stop doing any testing
Re: Coronavirus
Well now we have “mass testing” cases should in theory hit 100,000 a day to hit the real peak we had back in April.
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Coronavirus
Indeed, the deaths graph doesn't look the same, we're just finding all the cases that previously came and went without any record.
Re: Coronavirus
Negative result, back in six hours!
‘Normal’ life can resume...
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4684
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Coronavirus
That's good news.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Coronavirus
Re: Coronavirus
I'm still mostly lacking in endurance, although I did manage to get up to the shop this evening, including a couple of stops to catch my breath. I then turned back because I'm still technically infectious. Sigh. That said, in the week just climing down and up the stairs to get a coffee was leaving me with my head spinning.
So minor improvement but I think I'll spend most of tomorrow in bed reading things on the phone.
Exhaustion - dear christ it's frustrating.
So minor improvement but I think I'll spend most of tomorrow in bed reading things on the phone.
Exhaustion - dear christ it's frustrating.
Re: Coronavirus
GWS of course but perhaps a wake-up call to do something positive about your overall health - post-covid. Healthy young-ish people seem to shake it off pretty easily.
Re: Coronavirus
Pfft, young-ish. I'm knocking on 40. And most people don't have their job having them forcing them to work when they should be, you know, chilling out.
This is very much the last straw.