Coronavirus
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/0 ... d-shelved/
Basically they are now saying only the most vulnerable over 50 need a booster jab. One could argue the most vulnerable over 50 were the only people affected in the first place. The whole vaccination of children is ridiculous.
And I'm still firmly in the overreaction camp even though I've happily had my jabs.
Im glad I'm not in nz or aus.
Edit. No sunset watching
Basically they are now saying only the most vulnerable over 50 need a booster jab. One could argue the most vulnerable over 50 were the only people affected in the first place. The whole vaccination of children is ridiculous.
And I'm still firmly in the overreaction camp even though I've happily had my jabs.
Im glad I'm not in nz or aus.
Edit. No sunset watching
Re: Coronavirus
Looks like a MK2 Golf there...
The Evo forum really is a shadow of its former self. I remember when the internet was for the elite and now they seem to let any spastic on
IaFG Down Under Division
IaFG Down Under Division
Re: Coronavirus
2 hrs a day
The Evo forum really is a shadow of its former self. I remember when the internet was for the elite and now they seem to let any spastic on
IaFG Down Under Division
IaFG Down Under Division
Re: Coronavirus
Broccers, do you really follow Katie Hopkins on Instagram?
Does she ever show a bit of cleavage for the likes?
Does she ever show a bit of cleavage for the likes?
Re: Coronavirus
double post
Last edited by Broccers on Wed Aug 25, 2021 10:24 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Coronavirus
Love how you say that like following a right wing troll is the most obvious thing in the world
An absolute unit
Re: Coronavirus
do you mean an "echo chamber"..?
Re: Coronavirus
No
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... sh/vacuous
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... sh/chamber
Your(sic) welcome.
Are you bored lads, comment on the subject
Re: Coronavirus
yep, you either mean a vacuum chamber or an echo chamber.Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 11:15 amNo
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... sh/vacuous
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... sh/chamber
Your(sic) welcome.
Are you bored lads, comment on the subject
Saying "vacuous chamber" makes you sound like the sort of person who says "pacific" instead of "specific"...
Re: Coronavirus
THIS is an example of London cuntery which is why you live there as you fit inRich B wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 11:20 amyep, you either mean a vacuum chamber or an echo chamber.Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 11:15 amNo
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... sh/vacuous
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... sh/chamber
Your(sic) welcome.
Are you bored lads, comment on the subject
Saying "vacuous chamber" makes you sound like the sort of person who says "pacific" instead of "specific"...
Zero input still tho 10/10
Re: Coronavirus
There's a difference between not living in an echo-vacuous chamber and giving someone who says dumb shit for attention what they crave
But you're right. C'mon lads Broccers has embarrassed himself and would like to draw attention away from it so lets get back on topic.
You didn't happen to look up what pandemic means while you were on the dictionary website?
But you're right. C'mon lads Broccers has embarrassed himself and would like to draw attention away from it so lets get back on topic.
You didn't happen to look up what pandemic means while you were on the dictionary website?
An absolute unit
Re: Coronavirus
I still cannot work out of you just like ripping the piss or you really are a right wing thicko.Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 11:15 amNo
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... sh/vacuous
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... sh/chamber
Your(sic) welcome.
Are you bored lads, comment on the subject
Re: Coronavirus
Hehe you do realise it's exactly why there are no posts here for days?
Re: Coronavirus
Now does anybody agree people working in care homes should have the jabs?
This lot seem to think it's not required.
This lot seem to think it's not required.
Re: Coronavirus
It will be interesting to see where the data comes out with regard to whether being double jabbed actually significantly reduces transmission (especially of the delta variant). If it doesn't, as seems likely, then the whole approach of vaccinating people that are very low risk or do not want to for the benefit of others that are vulnerable clearly has no merit.
If it significantly reduces but does not eliminate transmission then you could perhaps build some sort of a case for compulsory vaccination but its a lot harder to argue given jabbed or unjabbed can both still contract and transmit the virus.
If it significantly reduces but does not eliminate transmission then you could perhaps build some sort of a case for compulsory vaccination but its a lot harder to argue given jabbed or unjabbed can both still contract and transmit the virus.
- Explosive Newt
- Posts: 1550
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm
Re: Coronavirus
We know that vaccination reduces the risk of serious illness and disease severity correlates with viral load. We know that viral load correlates with likelihood of infection*. To my thinking, it is likely we will see vaccines reducing transmission (and this is somewhat borne out by the slow rates of rise we are seeing at the moment) but the hard evidence isn’t there.
Hospitals are enforcing the rules about double jabbed people staying home from work after a contact and it’s a bloody nightmare, staffing wise.
I think the question won’t be “does double vaccination reduce transmission” but “does it reduce it enough”
Hospitals are enforcing the rules about double jabbed people staying home from work after a contact and it’s a bloody nightmare, staffing wise.
I think the question won’t be “does double vaccination reduce transmission” but “does it reduce it enough”