Coronavirus

User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5318
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by dinny_g »

Is it that straight forward though ??

The 2.4 people who contract it on the day on the beach aren't necessarily going to them go to another, similarly crowded place and pass it onto 2.4 more. If they go home and continue to effectively "Stay Safe" etc, then the onward infection rate decreases.

More reason to retain restrictions for longer I suppose
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by ZedLeg »

I’d say that if they were cool with a beach trip during a pandemic, chances are they aren’t being that careful at home 😉
An absolute unit
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by NotoriousREV »

Well, again I think as a one off event, it’s sort of fine but it’s an indicator that people are behaving in a less safe way so I don’t necessarily think those people who will sit on a crowded beach one day will the next day return to strict isolation.
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
Nefarious
Posts: 836
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:21 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Nefarious »

dinny_g wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 2:44 pm Is it that straight forward though ??

The 2.4 people who contract it on the day on the beach aren't necessarily going to them go to another, similarly crowded place and pass it onto 2.4 more. If they go home and continue to effectively "Stay Safe" etc, then the onward infection rate decreases.

More reason to retain restrictions for longer I suppose
Just to be crystal clear on the meaning of the numbers - nobody is saying 2.4 people will contract it from a day at the beach. 2.4 (Rev's quote) or 2.6 (my quoted R number) is the number of people on average an infected person will pass it onto in the entire course of their infection.

My (probably wildly inaccurate) numbers suggest that from a beach-based gathering as described, there will be an average of 0.001 new cases.
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough"
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5318
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by dinny_g »

Fair points all...
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4743
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

ZedLeg wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 2:41 pm It would be exactly on brand for this country to get two steps away from an all clear but fuck it because people can’t see beyond the end of their nose :lol:
This :lol:
User avatar
Nefarious
Posts: 836
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:21 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Nefarious »

NotoriousREV wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 2:49 pm Well, again I think as a one off event, it’s sort of fine but it’s an indicator that people are behaving in a less safe way so I don’t necessarily think those people who will sit on a crowded beach one day will the next day return to strict isolation.
Shades of grey. It about the majority to people doing mostly sensible things, rather than the two extremes of either licking everybody's face, or total isolation.

I think I'm coming round to the view that, at this point, there is reasonable cause for optimism that as long as most people are taking reasonable steps to reduce the chances of transmission (i.e. hand washing, surface sterilisation, reduced skin-to-skin contact), and the total number of interactions is low (i.e. few large, densely packed crowds), the path of decline will continue to near zero.
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough"
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5318
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by dinny_g »

Nefarious wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 2:58 pm I think I'm coming round to the view that, at this point, there is reasonable cause for optimism that as long as most people are taking reasonable steps to reduce the chances of transmission, and the total number of interactions is low (i.e. few large, densely packed crowds), the path of decline will continue to near zero.
This...
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
NotoriousREV
Posts: 6437
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:14 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by NotoriousREV »

Nefarious wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 2:58 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 2:49 pm Well, again I think as a one off event, it’s sort of fine but it’s an indicator that people are behaving in a less safe way so I don’t necessarily think those people who will sit on a crowded beach one day will the next day return to strict isolation.
Shades of grey. It about the majority to people doing mostly sensible things, rather than the two extremes of either licking everybody's face, or total isolation.

I think I'm coming round to the view that, at this point, there is reasonable cause for optimism that as long as most people are taking reasonable steps to reduce the chances of transmission (i.e. hand washing, surface sterilisation, reduced skin-to-skin contact), and the total number of interactions is low (i.e. few large, densely packed crowds), the path of decline will continue to near zero.
I think the fact that there don’t seem to have been any proper 2nd waves so far are the most encouraging.
Middle-aged Dirtbag
User avatar
Orange Cola
Posts: 2232
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:56 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Orange Cola »

It depends on how much you trust China’s figures but this is as close to a second wave as I think we are at the moment ie none

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... d-19-cases
Mustang GT 5.0 V8 -- Jaguar F-Pace
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 4614
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by duncs500 »

It's a bit sad that everyone is constantly on a downer about the people of this country. Over the lockdown the vast majority of people I've come into contact with have been doing all the right things. People see a few hundred people on a beach, and suddenly this country is a nation of morons, ignoring the fact that for every one doing it wrong there's probably a thousand doing it right.

It's not easy to give up your whole way of life for an indefinite period IMO, and I think we've done pretty well so far. The numbers would seem to agree.
Last edited by duncs500 on Thu May 21, 2020 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 4494
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by integrale_evo »

Cheers, Harry
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9627
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Rich B »

duncs500 wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 3:15 pm It's a bit sad that everyone is constantly on a downer about the people of this country. Over the lockdown the vast majority of people I've come into contact with have been doing all the right things. People see a few hundred people on a beach, and suddenly this country is a nation of morons, ignoring the fact that for every one doing it wrong there's probably a thousand doing it right.

It's not easy to give up your whole way of life for an indefinite period IMO, and I think we've done pretty well so far. The numbers would seem to agree.
indeed, you can almost hear Zed salivating over the idea of being able to say “I told you so” in his post... ☹️
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by ZedLeg »

Oh behave yourselves, it was a joke.
An absolute unit
User avatar
Ascender
Posts: 3557
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:07 pm
Currently Driving: 2019 M2 Competition

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Ascender »

dinny_g wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 3:00 pm
Nefarious wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 2:58 pm I think I'm coming round to the view that, at this point, there is reasonable cause for optimism that as long as most people are taking reasonable steps to reduce the chances of transmission, and the total number of interactions is low (i.e. few large, densely packed crowds), the path of decline will continue to near zero.
This...
Add me to the list of people who is optimistic about this.

I think it will maybe be Q4 this year before we can return to "normal", but so long as there's not a second wave, the interim measures should be ok although I do wonder how much it would take to kickstart a second wave. i.e. a hot summer in London with just a few cases coming-in could be catastrophic right?
Cheers,

Mike.
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Beany »

I dunno. I think people might generally be a bit more careful about personal space in general for a while after this...
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 4766
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Simon »

Ah, Zuck's being a Musk again.

The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4743
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Ascender wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 6:01 pm
dinny_g wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 3:00 pm
Nefarious wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 2:58 pm I think I'm coming round to the view that, at this point, there is reasonable cause for optimism that as long as most people are taking reasonable steps to reduce the chances of transmission, and the total number of interactions is low (i.e. few large, densely packed crowds), the path of decline will continue to near zero.
This...
Add me to the list of people who is optimistic about this.

I think it will maybe be Q4 this year before we can return to "normal", but so long as there's not a second wave, the interim measures should be ok although I do wonder how much it would take to kickstart a second wave. i.e. a hot summer in London with just a few cases coming-in could be catastrophic right?
The trouble with that is where will it be lapping around the world in the interim? Africa, S. America are clearly the big concerns. However, who's to say that Aus and NZ have yet escaped it? It's coming around to their winters so you'd expect that might play a part. Before you know it it's Autumn over here and if it's still circulating it could all kick off again.

I see there's a lot of noise about AstraZeneca at the minute - probably worth a punt for those that like to dabble. If the stories are to be believed their share price could skyrocket in late summer/early autumn...
Last edited by Swervin_Mervin on Thu May 21, 2020 10:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 4494
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by integrale_evo »

Not quite sure I can see how people think we've done well.

We did well to stop the NHS being overwhelmed, but by most other metrics we've done pretty poorly and our downwards curve is one of the worst in the world out of the places which got early infections, With only the shitstorm that is the USA, and Sweden which had no official lockdown being equally slow to get it under control.

As above though, that's all 'for now' as it's certainly not going away any time soon and is brewing up nicely in lots of other places. And as said, are those places which got control of it quickly going to become complacent and see higher second peaks than other places?
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Coronavirus

Post by ZedLeg »

Amazing coronavirus response from the glorious leader



Also YIKES

An absolute unit
Post Reply